mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MiNO: Cotangent-bundle propagator learning for PDEs

arXiv 2608.15187 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.CE cs.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific machine learning for partial differential equations commonly targets solution fields, as in physics-informed neural networks, or solution maps, as in neural operators. We study a third target: the propagator itself, a phase and amplitude in phase space. The motivation is a gap in regularity. A transported discontinuity is nonsmooth in space and time, yet the rule that moves it can be a polynomial phase carrying unit amplitude, so the object that generates an evolution can be far smoother than the field it generates. The microlocal neural operator (MiNO) learns that object, using the eikonal equation for the phase and the transport equation for the amplitude, and recovers the solution by an oscillatory integral. Sharp fronts and caustics then belong to propagation geometry rather than to a field fitted pointwise. Small residuals certify more than the reconstructed field. They place the learned canonical relation, the geometry that carries singularities, close to the exact one, and they separate trainable error from the frequency-truncation tail. On a matched-budget discontinuous-advection benchmark, MiNO stops improving within 10,000 steps at the accuracy limit of its finite reconstruction window, a limit predicted in closed form, whereas a physics-informed neural network with neural-tangent-kernel loss balancing stays near its initial error. On smooth advection, the mean error is 3.84×10-3 for MiNO and 3.12×10-2 for a supervised Fourier neural operator. Single-branch MiNO is the smallest model compared, and one trained generator serves five unseen initial conditions without retraining.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2026.

Builds on

18 of 53 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  3. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  4. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
  5. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
  6. 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 678
  7. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  8. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  9. 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 583
  10. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
  11. 2019Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networkscited by 368
  12. 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 102
6 more
  1. 2021On the approximation of functions by tanh neural networkscited by 81
  2. 2021Error analysis for physics informed neural networks (PINNs) approximating Kolmogorov PDEscited by 57
  3. 2020EikoNet: Solving the Eikonal equation with Deep Neural Networkscited by 50
  4. 2022Nonlinear Reconstruction for Operator Learning of PDEs with Discontinuitiescited by 30
  5. 2020Learning the geometry of wave-based imagingcited by 7
  6. 2021Deep Microlocal Reconstruction for Limited-Angle Tomographycited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.