Interpretable Cross-Lingual Alignment in Small Language Models: Probing Cultural and Pragmatic Reasoning in Japanese-English Bilingual LLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models work well on English and behave in poorly understood ways on languages typologically far from it. Japanese is a clean example, where evaluation still leans on translation quality and JGLUE-style benchmarks, which roll lexical, syntactic and pragmatic competence into a single score. The phenomena on which general-purpose models fail Japanese users are pragmatic: honorifics, in-group and out-group reference, context-sensitive politeness, zero anaphora. I introduce J-PragEval-v0, a minimal-pair benchmark isolating four such phenomena from surface fluency, and combine it with linear probes and teacher-forced log-probability evaluation to ask where inside TinySwallow-1.5B (28 layers, hidden size 1536) the corresponding contrasts live. The four features split three ways. Honorific register sits cleanly in the residual stream: 0.96 balanced accuracy at layer 15, and the model flips its preferred continuation with the scenario on 93 percent of items. Implicit subject and in-group reference are not linearly decodable at the final prompt token (0.48 and 0.38), yet flip rates are 0.77 and 0.79, so the contrast is worked out during generation rather than stored at the prompt. Indirect refusal is the negative case: 0.95 probe accuracy collapsing to a 0.43 flip rate under length-normalised teacher forcing, because the current minimal pairs conflate politeness with continuation length. I also specify Pragmatic Representation Steering, a parameter-free inference-time method that edits residual-stream activations along the class-mean-difference directions probing identifies. Feasibility is argued indirectly rather than demonstrated: the contrastive activation addition baseline, the same geometry the method would inject, recovers probe accuracy within one to two points of logistic regression wherever a linear signal exists. Scaling to Llama-3.1-Swallow-8B is the next step.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.
Builds on
5 of 16 references.
References · 5
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Cross-Lingual Consensus: Aligning Multilingual Cultural Knowledge via Multilingual Self-Consistency
- 2024Beyond English-Centric LLMs: What Language Do Multilingual Language Models Think in?
- 2025CALM: Unleashing the Cross-Lingual Self-Aligning Ability of Language Model Question Answering
- 2025Cross-linguistic disagreement as a conflict of semantic alignment norms in multilingual AI~Linguistic Diversity as a Problem for Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and AI~
- 2026OLA: Output Language Alignment in Code-Switched LLM Interactions
- 2026Rethinking the Multilingual Reasoning Gap with Layer Swap
- 2025Cross-Lingual Consistency: A Novel Inference Framework for Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Evaluating Multilingual and Code-Switched Alignment in LLMs via Synthetic Natural Language Inference