mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TRIAGE: Risk-Controlled Pseudo-Label Admission for Annotation-Efficient Semi-Supervised Retinal OCT Classification

arXiv 2608.14321 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The advanced retinal disease diagnosing imaging modality, optical coherence tomography (OCT), encounters a lack of automation because of the high expenses for annotations performed by specialists. The use of SSL solves the problem of insufficient annotations using unlabeled B-scans; however, most of the current techniques for generating pseudo-labels are based on prediction confidence without considering the asymmetry between different types of errors. This paper proposes TRIAGE, a risk-controlled semi-supervised framework for OCT scans classification, which uses the concept of a patient-level conformal risk controller with an asymmetric cost matrix. TRIAGE unites three crucial modules: a hierarchical classifier that is capable of working with partially abnormal supervision of the disease subtypes, a patient-grouped conformal risk controller with primal-dual coverage control, and a context-aware Transformer teacher for cross-slice verification. On the dataset from Noor Eye Hospital (16,822 B-scans, 161 patients, and 554 volumes) with a test set of unseen patients, TRIAGE demonstrates 89.66% scan-level accuracy, 0.8805 macro-F1, 0.9641 macro-AUC, and an 8.34% under-grading rate when using only 20% of the labeled data. With only 5% of the labeled data, TRIAGE keeps 76.88% accuracy and a 0.1656 under-grading rate. Compared with the other six state-of-the-art semi-supervised methods, TRIAGE significantly outperforms them with ablation study demonstrating the contribution of each module in the overall framework performance (by 42.7% in terms of under-grading rate comparing to fixed threshold methods). TRIAGE demonstrates 98.00% accuracy for 3-class classification with 1% labeled data and 95.94% accuracy for 8-class classification with 10% labeled data on the OCT-C8 dataset.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 60 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  6. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 537
  7. 2022FreeMatch: Self-adaptive Thresholding for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 232
  8. 2018Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysiscited by 178
  9. 2020CoMatch: Semi-supervised Learning with Contrastive Graph Regularizationcited by 167
  10. 2022Learning with Limited Annotations: A Survey on Deep Semi-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 74
  11. 2021Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Network for Automated AMD Classification using Retinal OCT Imagescited by 10
  12. 2023SegMatch: A semi-supervised learning method for surgical instrument segmentationcited by 5
2 more
  1. 2023Shifting to Machine Supervision: Annotation-Efficient Semi and Self-Supervised Learning for Automatic Medical Image Segmentation and Classificationcited by 5
  2. 2025Dual Cross-image Semantic Consistency with Self-aware Pseudo Labeling for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.