QUASAR: Lowering the Loss Floor of Quantization-Aware Training with Loss-Aware Reconstruction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language model inference shifts toward lower precision, post-training quantization (PTQ) becomes increasingly brittle, making quantization-aware training (QAT) essential for preserving model quality. However, QAT has a structural mismatch: gradient updates are applied to latent full-precision weights, while the loss and gradients are computed on lossy reconstructions of those weights. This mismatch can lead to suboptimal training trajectories and a higher loss floor. Second-order PTQ methods address a similar problem by minimizing loss-aware reconstruction error, but applying such expensive reconstruction repeatedly during QAT as the weights evolve is impractical. We introduce QUASAR, a QAT method that brings lightweight, loss-aware reconstruction into the training loop. At each training step, QUASAR reconstructs the latent weights by searching over a small set of clipping ranges and fitting dequantization parameters through saliency-weighted least squares. We use an exponential moving average of squared gradients as the per-parameter saliency signal. Our theoretical analysis shows that optimizing QUASAR's reconstruction objective tightens both the convergence and final-loss bounds of QAT. We evaluate QUASAR across four model families and across INT4, INT3, INT2, and NVFP4 quantization formats. QUASAR consistently achieves lower training and evaluation loss than competitive QAT methods and outperforms QAT and PTQ baselines on downstream benchmarks. At INT2, QUASAR improves average accuracy over the best QAT baseline by 13.3 points with quantization-aware distillation and by 10.9 points with QAT on mathematical reasoning data. Notably, after distillation on only about 600M tokens, QUASAR's INT4 Gemma-4 E4B checkpoint outperforms the corresponding QAT checkpoint released by Google, with 66% lower KL divergence and 1.8 points higher average accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.
Builds on
63 of 80 references.
References · 63
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
38 more
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,346
- 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,298
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
- 2021A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inferencecited by 815
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
- 2019Learned Step Size Quantizationcited by 628
- 2020Up or Down? Adaptive Rounding for Post-Training Quantizationcited by 621
- 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 539
- 2021BRECQ: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization by Block Reconstructioncited by 479
- 2023QuIP: 2-Bit Quantization of Large Language Models With Guaranteescited by 414
- 2024LongBench v2: Towards Deeper Understanding and Reasoning on Realistic Long-context Multitaskscited by 379
- 2024QuIP#: Even Better LLM Quantization with Hadamard Incoherence and Lattice Codebookscited by 378
- 2023LLM-QAT: Data-Free Quantization Aware Training for Large Language Modelscited by 324
- 2022Optimal Brain Compression: A Framework for Accurate Post-Training Quantization and Pruningcited by 322
- 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 292
- 2019HAWQ-V2: Hessian Aware trace-Weighted Quantization of Neural Networkscited by 261
- 2026Gemma 4 Technical Reportcited by 259
- 2019Differentiable Soft Quantization: Bridging Full-Precision and Low-Bit Neural Networkscited by 238
- 2020Loss landscapes and optimization in over-parameterized non-linear systems and neural networkscited by 233
- 2024Extreme Compression of Large Language Models via Additive Quantizationcited by 232
- 2019Understanding Straight-Through Estimator in Training Activation Quantized Neural Netscited by 231
- 2024QServe: W4A8KV4 Quantization and System Co-design for Efficient LLM Servingcited by 208
- 2025AIMO-2 Winning Solution: Building State-of-the-Art Mathematical Reasoning Models with OpenMathReasoning datasetcited by 174
- 2023Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling Lawscited by 159
- 2023Microscaling Data Formats for Deep Learningcited by 152
- 2024Scaling Laws for Precisioncited by 95
- 2024QTIP: Quantization with Trellises and Incoherence Processingcited by 91
- 2024Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queriescited by 88
- 2024BitDistiller: Unleashing the Potential of Sub-4-Bit LLMs via Self-Distillationcited by 84
- 2020On the Convergence of SGD with Biased Gradientscited by 83
- 2025Pretraining Large Language Models with NVFP4cited by 76
- 2025Quantization Hurts Reasoning? An Empirical Study on Quantized Reasoning Modelscited by 73
- 2024MARLIN: Mixed-Precision Auto-Regressive Parallel Inference on Large Language Modelscited by 52
- 2025ParetoQ: Improving Scaling Laws in Extremely Low-bit LLM Quantizationcited by 46
50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025DL-QAT: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Quantization-Aware Training for Large Language Models
- 2026Beyond Reconstruction Loss in Post-Training Quantization: Balanced Fitting for Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026SEPTQ: A Simple and Effective Post-Training Quantization Paradigm for Large Language Models
- 2026QuaSAR: Quantization Compensation via Stable Activation-Aware Rank Truncation
- 2024Low-Rank Quantization-Aware Training for LLMs
- 2026Understanding Quantization-Aware Training: Gradients at Quantized Weights Bias to the Low-Loss Basin
- 2026QTEA: Ternary LLMs with Sparse Residual Salient Weight and By-Column Optimization
- 2026Enhancing Post-Training Quantization via Future Activation Awareness