mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Query Knows What to Forget: A Second Erase Direction for Linear Attention

arXiv 2608.13668 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Linear attention keeps a state of fixed size. At long context, many stored items share this state, and interference between them degrades retrieval. Gated DeltaNet-2 (GDN-2), like every delta-rule model before it, derives its erase vector from the key of the current token. However, the interference in its reads is measured through the query, and the erase step cannot reach it. We introduce the Query-derived Erase Direction (QED). QED adds a second erase direction derived from the query and orthogonal to the key. In the fast-weight view, a key-directed delta edit cannot change the key-orthogonal part of a read. It uses the editable part to cancel old-state content measured along the query. It also improves retrieval at every length past the training window, and it about doubles the usable context length on S-NIAH-1.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.

Builds on

7 of 9 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 2,022
  2. 2024Gated Delta Networks: Improving Mamba2 with Delta Rulecited by 532
  3. 2021Linear Transformers Are Secretly Fast Weight Programmerscited by 502
  4. 2024Parallelizing Linear Transformers with the Delta Rule over Sequence Lengthcited by 396
  5. 2025Kimi Linear: An Expressive, Efficient Attention Architecturecited by 196
  6. 2026Gated DeltaNet-2: Decoupling Erase and Write in Linear Attentioncited by 33
  7. 2026Erase-then-Delta Attention: Decoupling Erase and Write Addresses in Delta-Rule Linear Attentioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.