mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Think in Latent, Explain in Language: Self-Explainable Latent Reasoning

arXiv 2608.13570 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Latent reasoning has emerged as a powerful alternative to text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT), offering significant gains in computational efficiency by compressing verbose reasoning into compact embeddings. However, compressing reasoning into the latent space renders the thinking opaque, hindering its interpretability. Current methods present a stark trade-off: they either function as unexplainable ''black boxes'' (e.g., Coconut), where the latent reasoning is not human-readable, or rely on separate post-hoc decoders for explainability (e.g., Heima), introducing architectural overhead and decoupling the explanation from the actual reasoning process. In this work, we present a unified framework for Self-Explainable Latent Reasoning (SELR) that trains a single model to perform efficient and inherently explainable latent reasoning. Our core contribution is a novel multi-task training objective that optimizes for two goals simultaneously: (1) an Answer Loss that optimizes the latent reasoning trajectory to produce accurate final answers, and (2) a CoT Loss that explicitly trains the same model to decode its own latent representations back into human-understandable reasoning steps. This design ensures that generated latent representations are both task-effective and semantically interpretable, eliminating the need for external decoders. We validate the effectiveness of SELR on both Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs), demonstrating that SELR achieves superior token efficiency and accuracy compared to baselines, while uniquely providing self-contained explainability without auxiliary models. Project page is available at https://jasondayuan.github.io/SELR/.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.

Builds on

11 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Models29 Oct
  2. 2025Energy-Based Transformers are Scalable Learners and Thinkers2 Jul
  3. 2025Efficient Reasoning with Hidden Thinking31 Jan

Other references · 8

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  4. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  5. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  6. 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 703
  7. 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationcited by 384
  8. 2023Implicit Chain of Thought Reasoning via Knowledge Distillationcited by 176

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Survey on Latent Reasoning
  2. 2026Unlocking the Black Box of Latent Reasoning: An Interpretability-Guided Approach to Intervention
  3. 2026CoLT: Teaching Multi-Modal Models to Think with Chain of Latent Thoughts
  4. 2026What Matters for Latent Reasoning with Flow Matching
  5. 2025Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  6. 2026Closing the Loop on Latent Reasoning via Test-Time Reconstruction
  7. 2026Latent Thought Flow: Efficient Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models
  8. 2026CALR: Continuous Anchored Latent Reasoning via Render-of-Thought Compression