PROVE-RT: Generating Mechanized Theorem Prover Scripts for Real-Time Systems using LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Schedulability analysis is essential for certifying real-time systems, but existing tests are often developed through pen-and-paper proofs that are difficult to scale, validate, and maintain. Mechanized verification in PROSA/ROCQ offers a rigorous alternative, yet manually constructing such proofs requires substantial domain expertise and proof-engineering effort. Recent successes of large language models (LLMs) across a wide range of tasks make them promising candidates for generating PROSA/ROCQ scripts for mechanized theorem provers. However, state-of-the-art LLMs often lack the PROSA-specific knowledge required to correctly use its modeling abstractions and proof patterns. This paper introduces PROVE-RT, an LLM-assisted framework for generating PROSA/ROCQ scripts to mechanize schedulability analyses in real-time systems literature. PROVE-RT guides generation through dependency-aware informal sketches, retrieval from processed PROSA documentation, staged skeleton generation, and proof completion. We construct a mechanization-oriented corpus from 1, 191 real-time systems papers, containing 13, 134 informal sketches with dependency information. On a curated evaluation set, direct prompting of state-of-the-art LLMs fails to reliably generate valid PROSA mechanizations, whereas PROVE-RT achieves a success rate of 44.7%. These results show that retrieval-guided and staged LLM assistance can improve automated mechanization of schedulability analysis in PROSA/ROCQ.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.
Builds on
18 of 53 references.
References · 18
- 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 427
- 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 391
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 388
- 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decompositioncited by 287
- 2023ProofNet: Autoformalizing and Formally Proving Undergraduate-Level Mathematicscited by 192
- 2024PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competitioncited by 165
- 2019The Lean mathematical librarycited by 134
- 2021Proof Artifact Co-training for Theorem Proving with Language Modelscited by 132
- 2019Learning to Prove Theorems via Interacting with Proof Assistantscited by 109
- 2022Thor: Wielding Hammers to Integrate Language Models and Automated Theorem Proverscited by 98
- 2025BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Provingcited by 84
- 2019Generating Correctness Proofs with Neural Networkscited by 37
6 more
- 2024Rango: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Proving for Automated Software Verificationcited by 27
- 2020The Tactician (extended version): A Seamless, Interactive Tactic Learner and Prover for Coqcited by 24
- 2022Passport: Improving Automated Formal Verification Using Identifierscited by 19
- 2025REAL-Prover: Retrieval Augmented Lean Prover for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 18
- 2024Graph2Tac: Online Representation Learning of Formal Math Conceptscited by 15
- 2026TorchLean: Formalizing Neural Networks in Leancited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.