mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inference-Time Orthogonal Seeding Enables Geometry-Aligned 3D Organ Segmentation for Slice-Propagation Methods

arXiv 2608.12658 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dense voxel-level annotation remains a major bottleneck in 3D medical image segmentation. Single-slice propagation methods such as Sli2Vol reduce this burden by propagating one annotated seed slice through a volume using label-free registration. However, axial-only propagation accumulates errors with distance from the seed, especially in surface-distance metrics, because it ignores coronal and sagittal evidence and therefore underuses the 3D information available in CT/MRI volumes. To better leverage volumetric geometry, we study how key training and inference choices affect slice-propagation models, including single-axis versus multi-axis label-free registration, single-seed versus multi-seed propagation, and orthogonal seed configurations. Instead of propagating from a single axial seed, we use three orthogonal seeds---one axial, one coronal, and one sagittal---and fuse their propagated labels with a simple label-free rule. Our results show that the training paradigm has limited impact: an axially trained network applied to off-axis seeds captures nearly all the improvement, while explicit three-axis training adds little. Instead, performance is driven by inference-time seed geometry, especially orthogonality rather than the number of annotated slices, as a budget-matched three-axial control provides no benefit and can even degrade performance. On a multi-organ CT cohort, orthogonal seeding with the axial Sli2Vol backbone improves Dice by 21.9%, Normalized Surface Dice by 25.5%, and reduces Average Hausdorff Distance by 53.5% over the single-axis baseline.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.

Builds on

12 of 22 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  2. 2018VoxelMorph: A Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image Registrationcited by 662
  3. 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 373
  4. 2020CHAOS Challenge -- Combined (CT-MR) Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentationcited by 309
  5. 2019Learning Correspondence from the Cycle-Consistency of Timecited by 269
  6. 2019The KiTS19 Challenge Data: 300 Kidney Tumor Cases with Clinical Context, CT Semantic Segmentations, and Surgical Outcomescited by 172
  7. 2015DeepOrgan: Multi-level Deep Convolutional Networks for Automated Pancreas Segmentationcited by 159
  8. 2014A New 2.5D Representation for Lymph Node Detection using Random Sets of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Observationscited by 56
  9. 2021Sli2Vol: Annotate a 3D Volume from a Single Slice with Self-Supervised Learningcited by 16
  10. 2023Orthogonal Annotation Benefits Barely-supervised Medical Image Segmentationcited by 15
  11. 2024EfficientMorph: Parameter-Efficient Transformer-Based Architecture for 3D Image Registrationcited by 3
  12. 2024Estimation and Analysis of Slice Propagation Uncertainty in 3D Anatomy Segmentationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.