mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MASCOT: Model-Aware Submodular Coverage for Composite-Attribute Text-to-Image Retrieval

arXiv 2608.12532 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2026cs.MM cs.CV cs.IRcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Document understanding and multimodal RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are highly effective in retrieving semantically relevant images. However, in practice, relevance alone is often insufficient. Systems must also achieve Result Diversification (RD) across composite attributes such as geography and time, a task for which precise control remains challenging. Current re-ranking methods, such as Multi-Source Determinantal Point Processes (MS-DPP), address this using manifold-based repulsion over similarity representations. Although this strategy is effective for broad exploration, it exposes a key limitation in manifold-based models: when subjected to diversity-decrease tasks on discrete metadata, they suffer substantial degradation in early-rank recall. To bridge this gap, we introduce MASCOT (Model-Aware Submodular Coverage for Composite-Attribute Text-to-Image Retrieval). Instead of relying on manifold repulsion, MASCOT formulates multi-attribute diversity as a resource allocation problem, projecting attributes into a soft-binning space weighted by query-driven importance. Averaged across the three PixelProse diversity-decrease tasks, MASCOT preserves an early-rank recall (R@10) of 88.58%, while MS-DPP retains 67.63%. The margin widens under composite constraints: on PP_geo_hour, where temporal and geographic diversity must be suppressed simultaneously, MS-DPP's recall collapses from 0.9737 to 0.4931 and its top-ranked result degrades to R@1 = 0.23, while MASCOT holds R@10 = 0.9410 and R@1 = 0.7202 at a diversity metric above the unconstrained baseline. We do not claim uniform superiority: on aggregate diversity-relevance scores our own simpler ablations attain higher harmonic means on all three decrease tasks, and MASCOT's advantage is specific to recall beyond rank 1 under composite constraints.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Document understanding and multimodal RAG, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 26 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.

Builds on

26 of 56 references.

References · 26

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  4. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  6. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  7. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
  8. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,362
  9. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  10. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,230
  11. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
  12. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 804
14 more
  1. 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 416
  2. 2022The Vendi Score: A Diversity Evaluation Metric for Machine Learningcited by 311
  3. 2019UNITER: UNiversal Image-TExt Representation Learningcited by 228
  4. 2023SkyScript: A Large and Semantically Diverse Vision-Language Dataset for Remote Sensingcited by 125
  5. 2021VinVL: Revisiting Visual Representations in Vision-Language Modelscited by 110
  6. 2024From Pixels to Prose: A Large Dataset of Dense Image Captionscited by 54
  7. 2013Submodular Optimization with Submodular Cover and Submodular Knapsack Constraintscited by 41
  8. 2022Incidents1M: a large-scale dataset of images with natural disasters, damage, and incidentscited by 26
  9. 2017VSE++: Improving Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Hard Negativescited by 21
  10. 2022Result Diversification in Search and Recommendation: A Surveycited by 12
  11. 2017Determinantal Point Processes for Mini-Batch Diversificationcited by 8
  12. 2019DPPNet: Approximating Determinantal Point Processes with Deep Networkscited by 5
  13. 2013Approximate Inference in Continuous Determinantal Point Processescited by 4
  14. 2025MS-DPPs: Multi-Source Determinantal Point Processes for Contextual Diversity Refinement of Composite Attributes in Text to Image Retrievalcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024INQUIRE: A Natural World Text-to-Image Retrieval Benchmark
  2. 2025ImageScope: Unifying Language-Guided Image Retrieval via Large Multimodal Model Collective Reasoning
  3. 2025Highlighting What Matters: Promptable Embeddings for Attribute-Focused Image Retrieval
  4. 2026Indexing Multimodal Language Models for Large-scale Image Retrieval
  5. 2025Llama Nemoretriever Colembed: Top-Performing Text-Image Retrieval Model
  6. 2025Chain-of-Thought Re-ranking for Image Retrieval Tasks
  7. 2024FiCo-ITR: bridging fine-grained and coarse-grained image-text retrieval for comparative performance analysis
  8. 2026CoCo-IR: Contextual Composed Image Retrieval