Curvature-Aware Zeroth-Order Optimization for Memory-Efficient Test-Time Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to enhance the cross-domain performance of pre-trained models by adapting to unlabeled test data. While most existing TTA methods rely on backpropagation (BP) for finetuning, BP-free methods such as zeroth-order (ZO) methods are more desired in practical on-device scenarios. ZO methods rely only on forward computation, which can largely reduce the complexity and memory overhead of on-device deployment. However, ZO methods suffer from much higher variance compared with first-order methods in estimating the gradient. To address this, we propose an improved ZO method to substantially boost the performance of ZO optimization based TTA. First, we provide an observation to reveal the persistent low-rank Hessian structure of the loss during the adaptation process. Based on this insight, we then propose a loss-landscape curvature-aware zeroth-order (CAZO) method, which leverages a sliding-average estimation of the diagonal Hessian to construct a covariance matrix for anisotropic perturbation sampling. CAZO operates by freezing pretrained weights and optimizing minimal adapter parameters via forward-only passes based gradient estimation, which can substantially reduce the memory overhead compared to BP-based methods. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CAZO significantly outperforms existing TTA methods, achieving state-of-the-art performance while maintaining an excellent balance between accuracy and memory efficiency. Code is available at https://github.com/Hollyming/CAZO.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.
Builds on
46 of 64 references.
References · 46
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
- 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
- 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 501
34 more
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2020AdapterHub: A Framework for Adapting Transformerscited by 444
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 377
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
- 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Just Forward Passescited by 345
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
- 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 236
- 2013Optimal rates for zero-order convex optimization: the power of two function evaluationscited by 198
- 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 189
- 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 189
- 2018AutoZOOM: Autoencoder-based Zeroth Order Optimization Method for Attacking Black-box Neural Networkscited by 137
- 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2023TTN: A Domain-Shift Aware Batch Normalization in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 101
- 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
- 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
- 2022Improving Test-Time Adaptation via Shift-agnostic Weight Regularization and Nearest Source Prototypescited by 67
- 2023On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptationcited by 64
- 2024Second-Order Fine-Tuning without Pain for LLMs:A Hessian Informed Zeroth-Order Optimizercited by 53
- 2023AdaNPC: Exploring Non-Parametric Classifier for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 48
- 2019Model Agnostic Contrastive Explanations for Structured Datacited by 41
- 2022How to Robustify Black-Box ML Models? A Zeroth-Order Optimization Perspectivecited by 39
- 2023TTA-COPE: Test-Time Adaptation for Category-Level Object Pose Estimationcited by 32
- 2024Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Extreme Sparsitycited by 28
- 2022Towards Explaining Distribution Shiftscited by 26
- 2024BECoTTA: Input-dependent Online Blending of Experts for Continual Test-time Adaptationcited by 25
- 2019On the Design of Black-box Adversarial Examples by Leveraging Gradient-free Optimization and Operator Splitting Methodcited by 21
- 2021ZARTS: On Zero-order Optimization for Neural Architecture Searchcited by 18
- 2021Optimizing Large-Scale Hyperparameters via Automated Learning Algorithmcited by 13
- 2023Certified Zeroth-order Black-Box Defense with Robust UNet Denoisercited by 11
- 2025Test-Time Model Adaptation for Quantized Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2024Brain-Inspired Online Adaptation for Remote Sensing with Spiking Neural Networkcited by 8
- 2025Effortless Active Labeling for Long-Term Test-Time Adaptationcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.