mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adversarial Resilience of Poisson-Process Submodular Maximization over Matroids, and Full-Bandit Learning

arXiv 2608.12134 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study nonnegative submodular maximization on n elements subject to a general matroid of rank k, when the offline algorithm is given an arbitrary controlled value oracle. Our main result is an adversarial resilience theorem for the Spiteful Greedy Swap Poisson Process (SGS-Poisson): without modifying its Poisson intensity, single-element exchange rule, or spiteful drop step, the algorithm retains limiting approximation factors 1/e for non-monotone objectives and 1-1/e for monotone objectives. More precisely, given an error bound xi≥0, under every controlled oracle widehat f satisfying |widehat f(S)-f(S)|≤ xi for every set S, our implementation returns a feasible set with expected value at least (1/e-varepsilon)OPT-O(kxi) and (1-1/e-varepsilon)OPT-O(kxi), respectively, where OPT is the feasible optimum. The implementation uses a deterministically bounded budget of O(nk2varepsilon-2log nlog2(1/varepsilon)) oracle calls. As a consequence, an offline-to-online reduction yields full-bandit combinatorial multi-armed bandit (CMAB) algorithms for general matroid-constrained submodular rewards with exact limiting approximation-regret factors 1/e and 1-1/e and widetilde O(n1/5k4/5T4/5) regret over T rounds. These online guarantees allow exploration to play sets that become independent after deleting at most one element; exploitation and the benchmark remain matroid-feasible. For unit-capacity partition matroids we obtain widetilde O(n1/5k3/5T4/5) under the same exploration relaxation. We establish a deterministic query budget by truncating the Poisson process and identify the enlarged action set needed to answer its offline queries.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.

Builds on

12 of 23 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018What Doubling Tricks Can and Can't Do for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 71
  2. 2019Online Continuous Submodular Maximization: From Full-Information to Bandit Feedbackcited by 33
  3. 2023A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedbackcited by 19
  4. 2023Randomized Greedy Learning for Non-monotone Stochastic Submodular Maximization Under Full-bandit Feedbackcited by 19
  5. 2023Combinatorial Stochastic-Greedy Banditcited by 18
  6. 2016Submodular Optimization under Noisecited by 11
  7. 2024Federated Combinatorial Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Banditscited by 11
  8. 2024Deterministic Algorithm and Faster Algorithm for Submodular Maximization subject to a Matroid Constraintcited by 6
  9. 2024Stochastic k-Submodular Bandits with Full Bandit Feedbackcited by 3
  10. 2026A Poisson Process for Submodular Maximizationcited by 2
  11. 2025A Unified Approach to Submodular Maximization Under Noisecited by 1
  12. 2026If it is Good Then Drop it -- a Spiteful Poisson Process for Submodular Maximizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Scale-free Adversarial Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2020Adaptive Discretization against an Adversary: Lipschitz bandits, Dynamic Pricing, and Auction Tuning
  3. 2025Regret Bounds for Robust Online Decision Making
  4. 2023Oracle-Efficient Pessimism: Offline Policy Optimization in Contextual Bandits
  5. 2021Corruption-Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2021Online Learning via Offline Greedy Algorithms: Applications in Market Design and Optimization
  7. 2026Near-Optimal Primal-Dual Algorithm for Learning Linear Mixture CMDPs with Adversarial Rewards
  8. 2026Toward Optimal Regret in Adversarial MDPs with Stochastic Hard Constraints