mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Locating and Controlling Implicit Personalization in Large Language Models

arXiv 2608.11735 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) often shift their outputs in response to implicit demographic cues even when users never state a demographic identity. Previous work has documented this behavior, but the connection between these behavioral changes and the model's internal activations remains unclear. Using matched cued and neutral conversations across five LLMs, we establish that a localized internal activation signal tracks changes in recommendations, with correlations up to r=0.87. When multiple cues appear together, their internal signals largely combine, but the changes in output do not simply add up. We further show that removing the internal signal associated with one cue can suppress its influence, often more effectively than asking the model to ignore demographics via prompting, while largely preserving general benchmark performance. However, the ability to selectively remove one dimension's influence while leaving co-present dimensions intact remains highly model- and attribute-specific. These results connect implicit personalization behavior to an internal signal that can be analyzed and causally controlled.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.

Builds on

29 of 40 references.

References · 29

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  4. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
  5. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  6. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  7. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  8. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  9. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
  10. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 412
  11. 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 359
  12. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
17 more
  1. 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
  2. 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 199
  3. 2023Bias Runs Deep: Implicit Reasoning Biases in Persona-Assigned LLMscited by 199
  4. 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Modelscited by 175
  5. 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendationcited by 114
  6. 2024Controlling Language and Diffusion Models by Transporting Activationscited by 68
  7. 2024Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrievalcited by 51
  8. 2025Learning without training: The implicit dynamics of in-context learningcited by 43
  9. 2024Who's asking? User personas and the mechanics of latent misalignmentcited by 40
  10. 2025FairSteer: Inference Time Debiasing for LLMs with Dynamic Activation Steeringcited by 40
  11. 2024Stereotype or Personalization? User Identity Biases Chatbot Recommendationscited by 34
  12. 2024Refusal in LLMs is an Affine Functioncited by 29
  13. 2025Reading Between the Prompts: How Stereotypes Shape LLM's Implicit Personalizationcited by 24
  14. 2024Implicit Personalization in Language Models: A Systematic Studycited by 18
  15. 2025Understanding and Mitigating Gender Bias in LLMs via Interpretable Neuron Editingcited by 14
  16. 2026Topics as Proxies for Sociodemographics: How Conversational Context Affects LLM Answerscited by 2
  17. 2026Fair outputs, Biased Internals: Causal Potency and Asymmetry of Latent Bias in LLMs for High-Stakes Decisionscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.