Unifying Physical Backpropagation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physical computing systems exploit device dynamics for computation, but their gradient-based optimization is challenging: backpropagation through a digital twin suffers from a model-reality gap. On-device gradient computation could resolve this issue, and a handful of theoretical and experimental studies have proposed ways to achieve it. Yet a unifying theory identifying when a physical system can compute the gradient of its own performance has been missing. Here we develop such a unification based on the adjoint method: we identify sufficient conditions under which the adjoint field required for formally exact gradients can be generated on the same hardware that performs the computation. Linear and nonlinear systems obey fundamentally different conditions: for linear systems, damping or gain is admissible provided reciprocity is preserved. For nonlinear trajectory systems, the sufficient conditions are reciprocity of the linearized system and the existence of a time-reversal mirror. Algorithmically, the nonlinear case requires infinitesimal nudging, whereas linear systems admit a finite-amplitude experiment. We recover (quantum) Equilibrium Propagation, Hamiltonian echo backpropagation, fully forward mode training and in situ gradient methods in integrated-photonic and free-space-optical systems. Finally, we show that reciprocity is a special case of more general intertwining conditions. For linear systems, these permit exact on-device gradients in a class of non-Hermitian, non-reciprocal systems. For nonlinear trajectories, they combine with generalized time-reversal mirrors to cover, e.g., PT-symmetric equations. The framework also includes time-dependent parameters and Onsager-reciprocal dynamics, providing a unified basis for formally exact physical learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 112 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.
Builds on
14 of 112 references.
References · 14
- 2020Training End-to-End Analog Neural Networks with Equilibrium Propagationcited by 63
- 2018Generalization of Equilibrium Propagation to Vector Field Dynamicscited by 23
- 2022Agnostic Physics-Driven Deep Learningcited by 15
- 2024Equilibrium Propagation: the Quantum and the Thermal Casescited by 10
- 2024Quantum Equilibrium Propagation: Gradient-Descent Training of Quantum Systemscited by 10
- 2025Learning long range dependencies through time reversal symmetry breakingcited by 7
- 2025Lagrangian-based Equilibrium Propagation: generalisation to arbitrary boundary conditions & equivalence with Hamiltonian Echo Learningcited by 6
- 2025Local Learning Rules for Out-of-Equilibrium Physical Generative Modelscited by 4
- 2025Near-Equilibrium Propagation training in nonlinear wave systemscited by 3
- 2026Equilibrium Propagation for Non-Conservative Systemscited by 3
- 2026Coercivity and Local Convergence of Physical Learning in Linear Circuitscited by 3
- 2025Nonlinear Computation with Linear Optics via Source-Position Encodingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.