Retrofitting Recurrent Depth into a Pretrained Language Model: Installation, Extrapolation, Transfer, and Retention at Two Parameter Budgets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A dense, pretrained language model can be retrofitted with recurrent depth and learn an iterative latent transition that persists after outcome-only annealing. Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct is split into a Prelude, a weight-tied Recurrent Block, and a Coda, with an identity-preserving one-loop path and a re-entry bridge on later loops. At loop 1 the retrofit remains non-inferior to its base on a preregistered ARC battery. Three findings. First, the mechanism is a reusable procedure rather than terminal-answer lookup, and installs at two budgets: 6M trained parameters over frozen base weights and 180M full-block. With intermediate-step supervision, the model computes one task step per loop and persists when only final answers are graded. The adapter matched the full block overall (83.8% versus 84.0%), led through depth 11, and trailed beyond. Verbal fine-tuning reached 79-86% on controlled verbal renderings (zero-shot transfer was minimal), and adapter verbal training begun from the installed mechanism outpaced matched fresh training by 18.6 points, including on a held-out test set. Second, the operation extrapolates to roughly 1.5 times its supervised depth, holding 70% accuracy through depth 18. Third, a same-size scratchpad-trained model matched the recurrent model within its learned horizon but collapsed beyond it. The recurrent model won overall, 84% versus 72%, retained 53% versus 2.5% beyond depth 10, and answered 7.6 times faster. An iterative transformer can therefore perform deeper reasoning in latent space faster than comparable or larger models fine-tuned on the same task, in a system-level comparison. A second task, running the rule in reverse, exposed the limits: the inverse was learnable in isolation, but no continuation acquired it while preserving the installed mechanism and general capability, a catastrophic-interference boundary. Learned depth selection remains open.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.
Builds on
22 of 25 references.
References · 22
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Modelscited by 871
- 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
- 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 603
- 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 479
- 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 399
- 2025Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approachcited by 372
- 2025CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillationcited by 216
- 2024Compressed Chain of Thought: Efficient Reasoning Through Dense Representationscited by 192
10 more
- 2025Hierarchical Reasoning Modelcited by 167
- 2021PonderNet: Learning to Pondercited by 156
- 2021Finetuning Pretrained Transformers into RNNscited by 94
- 2025Reasoning by Superposition: A Theoretical Perspective on Chain of Continuous Thoughtcited by 73
- 2024Relaxed Recursive Transformers: Effective Parameter Sharing with Layer-wise LoRAcited by 72
- 2026Parcae: Scaling Laws For Stable Looped Language Modelscited by 45
- 2024Procedural Knowledge in Pretraining Drives Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 41
- 2025Teaching Pretrained Language Models to Think Deeper with Retrofitted Recurrencecited by 41
- 2026Loop, Think, & Generalize: Implicit Reasoning in Recurrent-Depth Transformerscited by 34
- 2026Generative Recursive Reasoningcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Beyond Depth Truncation: Controlled Evaluation of Depth Utilization in Recursive Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026On-Policy Attention Linearizationcited by 0
- 2026Improving Test-Time Scaling with Adaptive Looped Transformerscited by 0
- 2026Transformers Stop Thinking Too Early, and a Tiny LoRA Fixes Itcited by 0
- 2026What Makes Recurrence Effective in Looped Language Models?cited by 0
- 2026What Makes Recurrence Effective in Looped Language Models?29 Sep 2026
- 2026Transformers Stop Thinking Too Early, and a Tiny LoRA Fixes It29 Sep 2026
- 2026Improving Test-Time Scaling with Adaptive Looped Transformers28 Sep 2026
- 2026On-Policy Attention Linearization25 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond Depth Truncation: Controlled Evaluation of Depth Utilization in Recursive Language Models17 Sep 2026