mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Empirical-Bayes Naive Bayes: Minimax Smoothing and Calibration with AODE Extension

arXiv 2608.11162 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Naive Bayes (NB) classifier remains a standard choice for categorical data, yet its widely used smoothing rules, such as Laplace, Lidstone, Krichevsky-Trofimov, and the m-estimate, all prescribe a fixed smoothing strength that ignores feature cardinality, sample size, and class imbalance, inducing a non-vanishing bias on modern high-cardinality tabular data. We propose hierarchical empirical-Bayes Naive Bayes (HEB-NB), in which each class-feature conditional probability is smoothed by a Dirichlet prior whose concentration is learned data-adaptively via Type-II maximum likelihood, enabling principled information sharing across classes while retaining closed-form inference. We further introduce HEB average one-dependence estimators (HEB-AODE), showing that the adaptive smoothing transfers cleanly to structural relaxations of NB. Theoretically, we establish a non-asymptotic ℓ1 error bound for HEB-NB matching the empirical-distribution minimax rate plus a vanishing data-adaptive bias, together with a matching Laplace-tight lower bound that yields a finite-sample, risk-level strict separation from Laplace. We further derive a plug-in excess Bayes-risk bound via total-variation tensorization and a population top-1 expected calibration error (ECE) corollary. Empirically, across 31 UCI and OpenML benchmarks, HEB-NB attains the best average Friedman rank on probabilistic metrics, with up to 22.1% log-loss reductions on high-cardinality datasets and consistent improvements of HEB-AODE over vanilla AODE. Combining HEB-NB with mutual-information weighting reduces top-1 ECE by 41%-70%, demonstrating substantial gains in probabilistic accuracy and calibration.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

3 of 37 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,902
  2. 2013Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifierscited by 53
  3. 2024Risk-based Calibration for Generative Classifierscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.