MoE Proxy Models for Low-Cost Failure Reproduction and Diagnosis in LLM RL Post-Training
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE in reinforcement learning and robotics
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training of large language models (LLMs) is computationally intensive and involves complex system pipelines with substantial debugging overhead. In practice, factors such as framework adaptation, numerical precision, and operator implementation can cause failures, including gradient overflow and loss divergence. Reproducing such failures directly on large models requires considerable time and computational resources. This paper systematically analyzes failures encountered during large-scale RL training on the Huawei Ascend platform, summarizes representative failure types, and identifies three model-side factors relevant to fault reproduction. Based on these factors, we propose a proxy-model construction method for low-cost fault investigation and auxiliary diagnosis. It employs structure-preserving, clustering-based expert pruning to select representative experts while retaining the model's backbone architecture, routing mechanism, and basic task capabilities. Our experimental results show that the proxy models reduce accelerator requirements by 50%-87.5% and achieve up to a 33.3x reduction in per-step NPU-hour cost, while preserving major training dynamics and reproducing fault responses consistent with the original models. Overall, the proxy models can serve as low-cost surrogates for fault reproduction, targeted validation, and auxiliary diagnosis in RL post-training.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE in reinforcement learning and robotics, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.
Builds on
26 of 42 references.
References · 26
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
14 more
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
- 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 815
- 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 811
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
- 2023Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilitiescited by 183
- 2024OpenRLHF: An Easy-to-use, Scalable and High-performance RLHF Frameworkcited by 73
- 2022Task-Specific Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Expertscited by 72
- 2025Defeating the Training-Inference Mismatch via FP16cited by 66
- 2024MoE-Pruner: Pruning Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Model using the Hints from Its Routercited by 62
- 2024Efficient Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Language Models: Enhancing Performance and Reducing Inference Costscited by 53
- 2024The N+ Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO: A Case Study on TL;DR Summarizationcited by 50
- 2025Cluster-Driven Expert Pruning for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2026Diagnosing Training Inference Mismatch in LLM Reinforcement Learning via a Zero-Mismatch Referencecited by 7
- 2025You Need Reasoning to Learn Reasoning: The Limitations of Label-Free RL in Weak Base Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Performance, Efficiency and Collapse -- Advantages and Challenges in Offline Post-training of Code LLMs
- 2025LlamaRL: A Distributed Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning Framework for Efficient Large-scale LLM Training
- 2026Robust Tool Use via Fission-GRPO: Learning to Recover from Execution Errors
- 2026Belayer: Efficient Fault Tolerance for LLM Agentic RL Training
- 2026From Trainee to Trainer: LLM-Designed Training Environment for RL with Multi-Agent Reasoning
- 2026Mechanism-Driven Monitors for Preemptive Detection of LLM Training Instability
- 2025AsyncFlow: An Asynchronous Streaming RL Framework for Efficient LLM Post-Training
- 2025Do Not Let Low-Probability Tokens Over-Dominate in RL for LLMs