mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Decision-Aware Approximation of Belief Functions for Evidential Combinatorial Optimization

arXiv 2608.10650 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.AI math.OCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reducing the number of focal elements of a mass function is classically driven by an intrinsic distance, such as Jaccard or Jousselme, that keeps the approximation close to the original as a body of evidence. We consider instead the case where the mass function feeds a linear combinatorial optimisation problem with evidential costs. What should then be preserved is not the closeness of the two mass functions, but the quality of the decision they induce. We introduce a decision-aware approximation that targets the regret of the decision: one decides with the cheaper approximation and is evaluated under the true mass function. On a minimal shortest path, the distance-optimal approximation flips the decision while a decision-aware merge preserves it, and this occurs on a non-negligible fraction of random instances. We prove a one-point bound that localises the regret at the true optimum, turn it into an exact dynamic program for the scalar case, and extend it to an online version that prunes focal elements before the final cost is known. In experiments the decision-aware compressor flips the decision less often than representation-aware compression, for both the linear criterion and a non-linear proxy read-out.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

5 of 15 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 339
  2. 2019Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial Solverscited by 226
  3. 2023Decision-Focused Learning: Foundations, State of the Art, Benchmark and Future Opportunitiescited by 130
  4. 2020Learning with Differentiable Perturbed Optimizerscited by 81
  5. 2018Decision-Making with Belief Functions: a Reviewcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.