mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Never Stop Speaking: a Denial-of-Service Attack on End-to-End Speech Language Models

arXiv 2608.10405 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.SD cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many studies have shown that specially crafted inputs can induce large language models (LLMs) to generate excessively long outputs, resulting in significant computational overhead and resource consumption. While most existing denial-of-service (DoS) attacks target text-only LLMs, end-to-end (E2E) speech LLMs are rapidly emerging. Existing text-based DoS attacks primarily rely on prompt engineering, such as adversarial suffixes or semantic inducement, which exploit the discrete nature of text inputs and therefore cannot be directly transferred to continuous speech inputs. Moreover, prior studies on speech model security mainly focus on ASR or TTS systems, leaving the DoS vulnerability of E2E speech LLMs largely unexplored. To address this gap, we propose the perturbation-based DoS attack targeting E2E speech models. Instead of inducing long outputs through prompt manipulation, our method optimizes imperceptible acoustic perturbations to directly influence the model's autoregressive generation process while preserving the original input length. Specifically, we formulate the attack as a composite optimization objective that jointly suppresses EOS generation, encourages prolonged decoding, and largely preserves semantic consistency by integrating weighted EOS loss, top-k logit loss, length loss, and semantic alignment loss. To further improve stealthiness, we employ voice activity detection (VAD) to inject perturbations only into voiced regions. Extensive experiments on three open-source E2E speech LLMs demonstrate that our method achieves stable attack success rate while significantly increasing generation length and GPU resource consumption, revealing security risks in modern ALLMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

8 of 18 references.

References · 8

  1. 2023Sparks of Large Audio Models: A Survey and Outlookcited by 41
  2. 2024Crabs: Consuming Resource via Auto-generation for LLM-DoS Attack under Black-box Settingscited by 35
  3. 2025Excessive Reasoning Attack on Reasoning LLMscited by 18
  4. 2023SlothSpeech: Denial-of-service Attack Against Speech Recognition Modelscited by 10
  5. 2025ExtendAttack: Attacking Servers of LRMs via Extending Reasoningcited by 10
  6. 2024Ichigo: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Realtime Voice Assistantcited by 6
  7. 2025DrVoice: Parallel Speech-Text Voice Conversation Model via Dual-Resolution Speech Representationscited by 6
  8. 2021A Hybrid CNN-BiLSTM Voice Activity Detectorcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024SpeechGuard: Exploring the Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal Large Language Models
  2. 2025`From Prompt to Perturbation': An Adaptive Framework for Voice-Based Jailbreaks on Audio LLMs
  3. 2026Audio Jailbreaks in Large Audio-Language Models: Taxonomy, Attack-Defense Analysis, and Cost-Aware Evaluation
  4. 2025Audio Jailbreak: An Open Comprehensive Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Audio-Language Models
  5. 2025Attack and defense techniques in large language models: A survey and new perspectives
  6. 2024Automatic and Universal Prompt Injection Attacks against Large Language Models
  7. 2024Breaking Down the Defenses: A Comparative Survey of Attacks on Large Language Models
  8. 2025Audio Jailbreak Attacks: Exposing Vulnerabilities in SpeechGPT in a White-Box Framework