ASPaeroFlow: Decomposition Heuristics for Joint Air Traffic Flow & Capacity Management
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While mathematical models act as vital decision support systems for operational Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management (ATFCM), existing approaches isolate Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) from Dynamic Airspace Configuration (DAC). This separation introduces an unresolved circular dependency between fixed-demand and fixed-capacity assumptions. Although joint optimization resolves this gap, the enlarged search space renders exact models computationally intractable for medium- to large-scale instances. To bridge this gap, we propose ASPaeroFlow: a heuristic for the joint ATFCM; it combines instance-space decomposition heuristics with a local exact approach using Answer Set Programming. We benchmark ASPaeroFlow from small to industry-sized instances and compare it with exact and alternative approaches. The results indicate that (1) the heuristic provides a computational middle ground between exact methods and operational baselines; (2) simultaneous optimization can outperform sequential optimization on joint ATFCM; and (3) an ablation study indicates that DAC has a larger impact on solution quality than flow measures.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.
Builds on
5 of 36 references.
References · 5
- 2020Train Scheduling with Hybrid Answer Set Programmingcited by 7
- 2026Investigating the Grounding Bottleneck for a Large-Scale Configuration Problem: Existing Tools and Constraint-Aware Guessingcited by 2
- 2023GraphDAC: A Graph-Analytic Approach to Dynamic Airspace Configurationcited by 1
- 2025Smart Expansion Techniques for ASP-based Interactive Configurationcited by 1
- 2026Joint Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management via Answer Set Programmingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.