mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FEAST: Federated Shared-Space Training for Resource-Heterogeneous Clients

arXiv 2608.09250 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) must serve devices with varying computational capabilities. A fixed model cannot suit all devices, while training one model per deployment limit is costly. Federated supernet training instead learns one elastic model with differently sized subnetworks, then deploys a suitable one to each device. When client inference budgets differ, however, parameters exclusive to high-cost subnetworks are reachable by fewer clients. We propose FEAST, a federated shared-space training framework that counters this imbalance by jointly training multiple subnetworks within each client's limit. Budget-tailored sub-supernet routing sends only the relevant supernet portion, and sparse aggregation merges the returned parameter slices. The trained supernet directly serves the subnetworks used during federation and supports post-hoc extraction of additional subnetworks without federated retraining. We further show that independently assigning clients' training-data volumes and inference budgets can distort accuracy--inference-cost comparisons in heterogeneous FL simulations, and introduce a one-parameter γ-allocation protocol to control this coupling. In our experimental setup, the SuperFedNAS and DeepFedNAS supernet training procedures remain near chance at 25M and reach at most 17.09% at 596M inference MACs; FEAST reaches 71.06% at 596M, 2.4 points above the strongest model-heterogeneous weight-sharing baseline at its largest tier. Across CIFAR-100, CINIC-10, and TinyImageNet-200, FEAST achieves the highest population-averaged accuracy among the evaluated weight-sharing methods when each client receives its largest affordable subnetwork. Sub-supernet routing reduces aggregate model-parameter traffic by 6.8× relative to full-supernet transmission.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 27 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  4. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 787
  5. 2020HeteroFL: Computation and Communication Efficient Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Clientscited by 337
  6. 2019Universally Slimmable Networks and Improved Training Techniquescited by 221
  7. 2021FjORD: Fair and Accurate Federated Learning under heterogeneous targets with Ordered Dropoutcited by 192
  8. 2020BigNAS: Scaling Up Neural Architecture Search with Big Single-Stage Modelscited by 188
  9. 2020Weight-Sharing Neural Architecture Search: A Battle to Shrink the Optimization Gapcited by 50
  10. 2022Efficient Split-Mix Federated Learning for On-Demand and In-Situ Customizationcited by 35
  11. 2020Towards Non-I.I.D. and Invisible Data with FedNAS: Federated Deep Learning via Neural Architecture Searchcited by 30
  12. 2024FIARSE: Model-Heterogeneous Federated Learning via Importance-Aware Submodel Extractioncited by 21
5 more
  1. 2022Towards Fair Federated Recommendation Learning: Characterizing the Inter-Dependence of System and Data Heterogeneitycited by 17
  2. 2022Pisces: Efficient Federated Learning via Guided Asynchronous Trainingcited by 8
  3. 2023Divide-and-Conquer the NAS puzzle in Resource Constrained Federated Learning Systemscited by 3
  4. 2025FedEL: Federated Elastic Learning for Heterogeneous Devicescited by 3
  5. 2026DeepFedNAS: Efficient Hardware-Aware Architecture Adaptation for Heterogeneous IoT Federations via Pareto-Guided Supernet Trainingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.