FedA2L: Adaptive layer-wise learning rate adjustment in decentralized federated learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decentralized intelligence systems with heterogeneous devices and limited coordination increasingly rely on decentralized federated learning (DFL). However, DFL suffers from convergence inefficiency under data heterogeneity due to the use of a uniform learning rate (LR) that ignores layer-specific optimization needs. Foundational layers are responsible for maintaining network consensus, while specialized layers adapt to local data characteristics, leading to conflicting gradients and degraded performance under non-IID conditions. To address this fundamental tension, this work introduces FedA2L, a method that dynamically adjusts layer-wise LRs based on model divergence signals. By leveraging local update intensity and network consensus constraints, FedA2L seamlessly integrates into existing DFL protocols without additional communication or coordination. Extensive evaluations across DFL algorithms, various model architectures, and datasets demonstrate that FedA2L achieves up to 4.94 times faster convergence than vanilla DFL and reduces communication rounds by up to 59% compared to scheduler-based baselines. Furthermore, FedA2L exhibits resilience to severe data heterogeneity, larger network sizes, and sparse topologies, reducing communication overhead and establishing it as a versatile optimization tool for resource-constrained or large-scale distributed learning in edge and IoT deployments. The code is released at https://github.com/nclabteam/FedA2L.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.
Builds on
23 of 54 references.
References · 23
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
- 2017Modeling Long- and Short-Term Temporal Patterns with Deep Neural Networkscited by 869
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
- 2019Decentralized Stochastic Optimization and Gossip Algorithms with Compressed Communicationcited by 218
- 2024Timer: Generative Pre-trained Transformers Are Large Time Series Modelscited by 198
- 2022FedDC: Federated Learning with Non-IID Data via Local Drift Decoupling and Correctioncited by 181
11 more
- 2022Decentralized Federated Learning: Fundamentals, State of the Art, Frameworks, Trends, and Challengescited by 137
- 2017Network Topology and Communication-Computation Tradeoffs in Decentralized Optimizationcited by 119
- 2023Decentralized Federated Learning: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 86
- 2023Improving the Model Consistency of Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 45
- 2020Adaptive Federated Learning and Digital Twin for Industrial Internet of Thingscited by 27
- 2025FedAWA: Adaptive Optimization of Aggregation Weights in Federated Learning Using Client Vectorscited by 19
- 2024HyperbolicLR: Epoch insensitive learning rate schedulercited by 3
- 2023Federated Learning via Consensus Mechanism on Heterogeneous Data: A New Perspective on Convergencecited by 2
- 2024Optimizing Personalized Federated Learning through Adaptive Layer-Wise Learningcited by 2
- 2024FLARE: A New Federated Learning Framework with Adjustable Learning Rates over Resource-Constrained Wireless Networkscited by 1
- 2025PLayer-FL: A Principled Approach to Personalized Layer-wise Cross-Silo Federated Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.