mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Signature-Guided Capacity Occupancy for Dense Expert Merging

arXiv 2608.09201 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dense expert merging combines domain-specialized language models into one single checkpoint, typically by admitting task-vector support in weight space. However, this admission is governed by three decisions that existing methods answer only partially: where to open layer capacity from cross-expert conflict, who should occupy that capacity based on domain demand, and how to admit the resulting support without relying on costly recipe search. To tackle these issues, we propose SigMerge (Signature-Guided Capacity Occupancy), a structured capacity assignment framework for dense expert merging. Starting from a dense base merge, conflict signatures set each layer's capacity from cross-expert conflict, positive base-merge deficits set each domain's share of that capacity, and a sequential occupancy rule admits each expert delta up to the resulting layer-domain budget. Across 21 paired settings spanning seven dense base merges and three model pools, SigMerge improves every one (by 15.0% on average) and achieves the best average rank (1.67) among six merging methods, outperforming three categories of merging baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

Builds on

19 of 27 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  5. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  6. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  7. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  8. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  9. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  10. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
  11. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
  12. 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
7 more
  1. 2022Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Modelscited by 384
  2. 2024Localizing Task Information for Improved Model Merging and Compressioncited by 130
  3. 2024LiNeS: Post-training Layer Scaling Prevents Forgetting and Enhances Model Mergingcited by 39
  4. 2025MergeBench: A Benchmark for Merging Domain-Specialized LLMscited by 30
  5. 2025CAT Merging: A Training-Free Approach for Resolving Conflicts in Model Mergingcited by 22
  6. 2025Towards Minimizing Feature Drift in Model Merging: Layer-wise Task Vector Fusion for Adaptive Knowledge Integrationcited by 12
  7. 2025CABS: Conflict-Aware and Balanced Sparsification for Enhancing Model Mergingcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.