Closing the loop in learning with missing data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
What should a machine learning model learn when data is missing during training? We look at the learning process from a dynamical systems perspective, cast data missingness as a structured loss of actuation that limits controllability of the parameter error dynamics, and ultimately derive adaptation mechanisms with Lyapunov stability characteristics that throttle model updates in ways that preserve learning coherence under partial, intermittent observability. Under recurrent excitation, our analysis provides ISS-type residual-to-state bounds with respect to a bounded closed-loop mismatch between the loss residual and the preconditioned update geometry. We evaluate the efficacy of our directional observability-aware adaptive learning approach on multimodal contexts, reinforcing its premise in promoting learning coherence and stability even in pathologically sparse domains and problems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.
Builds on
9 of 31 references.
References · 9
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2015Data-driven Distributionally Robust Optimization Using the Wasserstein Metric: Performance Guarantees and Tractable Reformulationscited by 285
- 2015Online Learning with Feedback Graphs: Beyond Banditscited by 79
- 2023ReMasker: Imputing Tabular Data with Masked Autoencodingcited by 35
- 2023Distributionally Robust Optimization with Probabilistic Groupcited by 14
- 2023Multiclass Online Learnability under Bandit Feedbackcited by 12
- 2026Partial Feedback Online Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.