Inductive Graph Layout with Implicit Neural Fields
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A graph layout is normally a table of N free coordinates. We optimise a function with a fixed number of parameters instead. This gives a drawing a sample complexity and an extensible domain. Force-directed algorithms remain the standard tools for graph drawing. The most accurate among them minimise stress in the Kamada-Kawai formulation by directly optimising the node coordinates, at a full objective cost of O(N2) in time and space. Here, we propose Fling (Field Layout via Implicit Neural Geometry), a small neural network mapping the distances of each node to a set of landmarks, positioning it in the plane by training on the layout energy. The full spring system then becomes tractable without its distance matrix, as rest lengths follow from a landmark bound in constant time per pair while a second network learns the majorisation sums from exact anchor rows, at O(|A|N) per step for |A|ll N anchors. Unlike neural drawers that read the graph by message passing, we represent the drawing as a function of node features. An unseen node costs one forward pass, where sparse and low-rank majorisation remain transductive. As the unknowns are weights rather than coordinates, the energy only requires a small fraction of the nodes, and a field fitted that way outperforms PivotMDS, landmark MDS, and a kernel ridge trained on the same energy and features, when the task is fitting the energy of a graph from a sample of its nodes. In addition, the same parameterisation enables a stochastic pivot stress variant, an aesthetics-optimised variant carrying a neighbour-embedding energy with node-edge clearance and crossing terms on the same field, and conditioning on the weight between two energies gives a whole layout family from one run.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2026.
Builds on
9 of 30 references.
References · 9
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
- 2020Learning Continuous Image Representation with Local Implicit Image Functioncited by 552
- 2016Visualizing Large-scale and High-dimensional Datacited by 79
- 2021DeepGD: A Deep Learning Framework for Graph Drawing Using GNNcited by 10
- 2016A Sparse Stress Modelcited by 6
- 2020DRGraph: An Efficient Graph Layout Algorithm for Large-scale Graphs by Dimensionality Reductioncited by 5
- 2024"Normalized Stress" is Not Normalized: How to Interpret Stress Correctlycited by 5
- 2024CoRe-GD: A Hierarchical Framework for Scalable Graph Visualization with GNNscited by 2
- 2025Word2VecGD: Neural Graph Drawing with Cosine-Stress Optimizationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.