Rethinking Attention Locality in Spiking Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spiking Transformers provide a promising paradigm for efficient visual processing with spike-driven computation, yet their Softmax-free Spiking Self-Attention (SSA) struggles to establish spatially localized token interactions. Although existing locality-enhanced SSA methods improve accuracy, it remains unclear whether they consistently induce spatial locality across layers and different Spiking Transformer architectures. Through Mean Attention Distance (MAD) analysis, we reveal that computational locality does not necessarily translate into spatial locality and show that uniformly applying the same locality enhancement overlooks architecture-dependent deployment requirements. Motivated by these observations, we propose Spatially Contiguous Local Attention with Boundary Continuity Pathway (SCLA-BCP). SCLA computes attention within non-overlapping regions of spatially adjacent tokens, while BCP facilitates cross-boundary information exchange through a lightweight convolutional pathway. Furthermore, we develop a hierarchical locality deployment strategy to effectively apply SCLA-BCP across the two major Spiking Transformer architectures. Extensive experiments on seven static and neuromorphic datasets covering classification, detection, and segmentation demonstrate consistent improvements with limited parameter and energy overhead. Notably, our approach improves mAP@50 by up to 9.50% on COCO 2017 and mIoU by up to 3.42% on ADE20K. Visualizations, MAD analysis, and ablation studies further validate its effectiveness.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2026.
Builds on
22 of 38 references.
References · 22
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2022MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformercited by 476
- 2022Spikformer: When Spiking Neural Network Meets Transformercited by 271
- 2021Training Spiking Neural Networks Using Lessons From Deep Learningcited by 259
- 2021Rethinking and Improving Relative Position Encoding for Vision Transformercited by 207
- 2023Spike-driven Transformercited by 146
- 2024Spike-driven Transformer V2: Meta Spiking Neural Network Architecture Inspiring the Design of Next-generation Neuromorphic Chipscited by 103
- 2024Scaling Spike-driven Transformer with Efficient Spike Firing Approximation Trainingcited by 59
- 2024QKFormer: Hierarchical Spiking Transformer using Q-K Attentioncited by 49
10 more
- 2015Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systemscited by 48
- 2024Spiking Transformer with Spatial-Temporal Attentioncited by 19
- 2024Spike2Former: Efficient Spiking Transformer for High-performance Image Segmentationcited by 19
- 2025Quantized Spike-driven Transformercited by 13
- 2023Spikingformer: A Key Foundation Model for Spiking Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2025Hybrid Spiking Vision Transformer for Object Detection with Event Camerascited by 7
- 2025Toward Relative Positional Encoding in Spiking Transformerscited by 3
- 2026Neural Dynamics Self-Attention for Spiking Transformerscited by 2
- 2024SpikeAtConv: An Integrated Spiking-Convolutional Attention Architecture for Energy-Efficient Neuromorphic Vision Processingcited by 1
- 2026Breaking Global Self-Attention Bottlenecks in Transformer-based Spiking Neural Networks with Local Structure-Aware Self-Attentioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.