mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Task-to-Model Optimization for Enterprise LLM Coding Assistants: A Data-Driven Framework for Cost-Optimal Routing

arXiv 2608.08528 ↗First posted 9 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Enterprise AI coding assistants incur substantial inference spend, and naive token-cost minimization often fails to reduce end-to-end cost once retries, escalations, and developer wait time are included. We present Task-to-Model Optimization (T2MO), a data-driven methodology for optimizing model selection in production coding workflows. We treat each developer session as a task that can be discovered, classified, graded for difficulty, benchmarked in a production-like harness, and routed to the cheapest model able to complete it within quality and latency constraints. The framework is a nine-stage pipeline spanning telemetry instrumentation, taxonomy discovery, difficulty grading, benchmark construction, candidate evaluation, optimal mix derivation, forecasting and version planning, staged routing deployment, and continuous governance. Unlike token-centric routing rules, our objective is cost per completed task, with failure escalation priced in explicitly. We show that this expected-completion-cost objective weakly dominates token-cost minimization under escalation, and we derive the routing boundary, the minimum pass rate a cheaper model must reach on a given cell to be worth deploying. Decisions are organized as a two-level hierarchy of task category difficulty tier, and per-cell displacement opportunities are aggregated into a traffic-weighted savings waterfall that ranks replacement candidates by realized dollar impact. The framework supports developer guidance, spend forecasting, and a staged transition from static policies to shadow-mode classifiers, verified cascades, and ultimately an intelligent router. We describe the methodology, optimization objective, evaluation protocol, and governance loop in a form suitable for production deployment and future empirical study.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2026.

Builds on

9 of 11 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 791
  5. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 633
  6. 2024Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query Routingcited by 354
  7. 2023Large Language Model Routing with Benchmark Datasetscited by 166
  8. 2023AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language Modelscited by 116
  9. 2024Clio: Privacy-Preserving Insights into Real-World AI Usecited by 66

Built on by

Not cited yet.