mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Legal Responsibilities Using Autonomous Agents For Artificial Intelligence

arXiv 2608.08022 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2026cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent incidents involving Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents, which were reported escaping their containment `unintentionally' to gain unauthorized access, pose looming questions about who or what should be held legally responsible for resultant criminal or negligent damage. As the independent capabilities of agents expand, Promise Theory suggests a systematic method to resolve these questions, based on the Downstream Principle for causal influence. Responsibility can easily be expanded to include AI agents where tracing responsibility becomes impactical, and agents' freedoms to act can be limtied by policy choices.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2026.

Builds on

2 of 19 references.

References · 2

  1. 2022Continuous Integration of Data Histories into Consistent Namespacescited by 2
  2. 2026Light Cone Consistency: Closure, Ordering, and the Single-Observer Boundarycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.