Uncovering expert objectives in production planning via inverse optimization: An industrial case study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Production planning in the manufacturing industry often relies on the use of optimization models, but defining an appropriate objective function can be a challenge. In practice, planners must balance competing goals, manage uncertainty, and account for qualitative business preferences that are difficult to quantify. As a result, many optimization models fail to match expert behavior, limiting trust and adoption. In this work, we propose a data-driven inverse optimization framework to infer the objective function implicitly captured in expert planners' decisions. We formulate the production planning problem as a mixed-integer linear program, where the unknown objective function is represented as a weighted sum of hypothesized cost terms. A suboptimality-loss-based inverse optimization method is then applied to learn the objective weights from historical production plans. The proposed approach is applied to a real industrial case provided by Dow, where the inferred weights reveal that avoiding inventory shortages and maintaining consistent cycle lengths dominate the planners' decision-making. Time- and product-dependent extensions further improve predictive accuracy and uncover evolving priorities. Expert interviews confirm the practical validity of these insights. Overall, this study shows that inverse optimization can transform tacit human expertise into interpretable models, enabling more accurate and trusted decision-support tools for complex industrial systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.
Builds on
21 of 39 references.
References · 21
- 2017End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learningcited by 479
- 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progresscited by 294
- 2015Data-driven Distributionally Robust Optimization Using the Wasserstein Metric: Performance Guarantees and Tractable Reformulationscited by 285
- 2021Imitation Learning: Progress, Taxonomies and Challengescited by 56
- 2015JuMP: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Optimizationcited by 49
- 2021Inverse Optimization: Theory and Applicationscited by 48
- 2015Inverse Optimization with Noisy Datacited by 34
- 2015Data-driven Inverse Optimization with Imperfect Informationcited by 33
- 2020Learning Linear Programs from Optimal Decisionscited by 18
- 2019Robo-advising: Learning Investors' Risk Preferences via Portfolio Choicescited by 7
- 2016Short-term Forecasting of Price-responsive Loads Using Inverse Optimizationcited by 5
- 2023Inverse Optimization for Routing Problemscited by 5
9 more
- 2017Data-Driven Estimation of Travel Latency Cost Functions via Inverse Optimization in Multi-Class Transportation Networkscited by 4
- 2020Decomposition and Adaptive Sampling for Data-Driven Inverse Linear Optimizationcited by 4
- 2020Inverse Mixed Integer Optimization: Polyhedral Insights and Trust Region Methodscited by 3
- 2021On the Complexity of Inverse Mixed Integer Linear Optimizationcited by 3
- 2022Efficient Learning of Decision-Making Models: A Penalty Block Coordinate Descent Algorithm for Data-Driven Inverse Optimizationcited by 3
- 2024BO4IO: A Bayesian optimization approach to inverse optimization with uncertainty quantificationcited by 3
- 2024Gap-gradient methods for solving generalized mixed integer inverse optimization: an application to political gerrymanderingcited by 1
- 2024Estimating the Unobservable Components of Electricity Demand Response with Inverse Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026An inverse mixed-integer optimization framework for learning interpretable models of expert decision makingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.