mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Is SwiGLU's Open Positive Tail Necessary? Evidence from Closed-Tail Gating with MemGLU

arXiv 2608.07323 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We test whether decoder-only language-model FFNs require SwiGLU's open positive tail. We introduce MemGLU as a closed-tail comparator derived from a memristive branch geometry. Across paired 9M and 30M pretraining runs with three seeds, MemGLU remains within about 0.1% of SwiGLU in validation NLL. Trained SwiGLU checkpoints are sensitive to positive-tail suppression, while mechanism diagnostics show that the two models use their gates differently despite similar losses. These results suggest that models adapt to the gate geometry available during pretraining. At the tested scales, SwiGLU's open positive tail is not necessary for decoder-only language-model FFNs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

12 of 18 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  4. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  5. 2016Language Modeling with Gated Convolutional Networkscited by 702
  6. 2024Scaling FP8 training to trillion-token LLMscited by 65
  7. 2024CATS: Contextually-Aware Thresholding for Sparsity in Large Language Modelscited by 41
  8. 2024Polynomial Composition Activations: Unleashing the Dynamics of Large Language Modelscited by 9
  9. 2024Deriving Activation Functions Using Integrationcited by 5
  10. 2024Expanded Gating Ranges Improve Activation Functionscited by 4
  11. 2026PowLU: An Activation Function for Stable Pre-Training of LLMscited by 4
  12. 2026More Expressive Feedforward Layers: Part I. Token-Adaptive Mixing of Activationscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.