Why Study Emergent Behavior When You Can Regulate It? Aligning Multi-Agent Systems with Reward Prediction
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent simulations are widely used to study complex social and ecological systems, where rich and often unexpected emergent behaviors arise from local interactions. A large body of prior work has focused on analyzing such emergent dynamics across domains. In this paper, we move beyond analyzing emergent behavior and introduce a learning-based mechanism for actively shaping it via social reward modeling. We introduce Multi-Agent Reward Prediction (MARP), a simple framework that extends preference-based reward modeling to multi-agent reinforcement learning. While the framework is designed to be applicable across multi-agent settings, the present empirical validation is limited to a single environment, and we therefore present MARP as a proof of concept within the studied domain. Rather than relying on handcrafted rewards, MARP learns a shared reward model from episode-level evaluations of collective outcomes, enabling decentralized agents to align their behavior with global social objectives. We study MARP in the Harvest Game, a canonical sequential social dilemma modeling common-pool resource management and related real-world challenges. Our results show that MARP can be tuned to produce behavior that is more closely aligned with target social metrics than standard reward-based baselines, while the learned reward model captures subtle environmental structure without explicit programming. Crucially, MARP supports multiple and composite social objectives within a single training regime. By modifying only the high-level evaluation metric, the same framework seamlessly aligns agent behavior with diverse goals, including sustainability, equality, and peace, as well as combinations of individual and group-level objectives. These findings demonstrate that emergent multi-agent behavior can be treated not only as a phenomenon to study, but as a target of principled, data-driven regulation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.
Builds on
7 of 19 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction19 Nov
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun
Other references · 5
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 246
- 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 206
- 2021Building a Foundation for Data-Driven, Interpretable, and Robust Policy Design using the AI Economistcited by 22
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Role of Social Learning and Collective Norm Formation in Fostering Cooperation in LLM Multi-Agent Systems
- 2023Discovering Individual Rewards in Collective Behavior through Inverse Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2023Understanding the World to Solve Social Dilemmas Using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Agent-Specific Preference
- 2026The Energy Society: A Simulation Environment for Studying Agent Cooperation under Survival Pressure
- 2025World Models Unlock Optimal Foraging Strategies in Reinforcement Learning Agents
- 2024The State-Action-Reward-State-Action Algorithm in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game
- 2025Emergent Social Dynamics of LLM Agents in the El Farol Bar Problem