mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Why Study Emergent Behavior When You Can Regulate It? Aligning Multi-Agent Systems with Reward Prediction

arXiv 2608.07280 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent simulations are widely used to study complex social and ecological systems, where rich and often unexpected emergent behaviors arise from local interactions. A large body of prior work has focused on analyzing such emergent dynamics across domains. In this paper, we move beyond analyzing emergent behavior and introduce a learning-based mechanism for actively shaping it via social reward modeling. We introduce Multi-Agent Reward Prediction (MARP), a simple framework that extends preference-based reward modeling to multi-agent reinforcement learning. While the framework is designed to be applicable across multi-agent settings, the present empirical validation is limited to a single environment, and we therefore present MARP as a proof of concept within the studied domain. Rather than relying on handcrafted rewards, MARP learns a shared reward model from episode-level evaluations of collective outcomes, enabling decentralized agents to align their behavior with global social objectives. We study MARP in the Harvest Game, a canonical sequential social dilemma modeling common-pool resource management and related real-world challenges. Our results show that MARP can be tuned to produce behavior that is more closely aligned with target social metrics than standard reward-based baselines, while the learned reward model captures subtle environmental structure without explicit programming. Crucially, MARP supports multiple and composite social objectives within a single training regime. By modifying only the high-level evaluation metric, the same framework seamlessly aligns agent behavior with diverse goals, including sustainability, equality, and peace, as well as combinations of individual and group-level objectives. These findings demonstrate that emergent multi-agent behavior can be treated not only as a phenomenon to study, but as a target of principled, data-driven regulation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

7 of 19 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction19 Nov
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 5

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  3. 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 246
  4. 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 206
  5. 2021Building a Foundation for Data-Driven, Interpretable, and Robust Policy Design using the AI Economistcited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Role of Social Learning and Collective Norm Formation in Fostering Cooperation in LLM Multi-Agent Systems
  2. 2023Discovering Individual Rewards in Collective Behavior through Inverse Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2023Understanding the World to Solve Social Dilemmas Using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Agent-Specific Preference
  5. 2026The Energy Society: A Simulation Environment for Studying Agent Cooperation under Survival Pressure
  6. 2025World Models Unlock Optimal Foraging Strategies in Reinforcement Learning Agents
  7. 2024The State-Action-Reward-State-Action Algorithm in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game
  8. 2025Emergent Social Dynamics of LLM Agents in the El Farol Bar Problem