mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpretable reinforcement learning with decision-tree pruning

arXiv 2608.07151 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning policies are difficult to inspect, but interpreting them is a prerequisite for trustworthiness. Converting a trained policy into explicit decision-tree rules improves transparency and the resulting artifacts often remain too complex for human understanding. We present a pruning process that simplifies such rule-based policies while preserving task performance and making edits to the policy auditable. The process defines a small set of structural and usage-aware operators and evaluates candidate edits by re-executing the policy to measure return and interpretability proxies. This exposes an transformation process from complex to compact policy structures. We investigate this approach on classic control and MuJoCo benchmarks, where pruning traces reveal consistent interpretability improvements while maintaining high performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

9 of 21 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  2. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
  3. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  4. 2018Programmatically Interpretable Reinforcement Learningcited by 192
  5. 2018Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extractioncited by 176
  6. 2016Graying the black box: Understanding DQNscited by 68
  7. 2023Interpretable and Explainable Logical Policies via Neurally Guided Symbolic Abstractioncited by 45
  8. 2024Interpretable and Editable Programmatic Tree Policies for Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
  9. 2025Evaluating Interpretable Reinforcement Learning by Distilling Policies into Programscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.