Are Visual Place Recognition Models Recognizing Places or Conditions? Distractor-Augmented Evaluation and Condition Suppression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Long-term Visual Place Recognition (VPR) is typically evaluated by matching queries from one condition against a database from another. Crowdsourced map databases, however, may mix conditions and include images that resemble the query in condition but depict different places. In the presence of these distractors, a method may retrieve by condition similarity rather than place identity. We argue that this susceptibility arises because the discriminability of VPR methods allows them to encode information such as illumination, weather, and seasonal appearance in their descriptors. We therefore introduce Distractor-Augmented Recall (DAR) to isolate and quantify the effect of distractors, and propose condition suppression to remove condition information from VPR descriptors. Across eleven methods and six datasets, method rankings under DAR@1 differ from those under Recall@1 (R@1), while applying INLP and LEACE as condition suppression methods generally improves DAR@1 without reducing R@1. Thus, distractor robustness is distinct from standard retrieval performance and can be improved by suppressing condition information.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.
Builds on
24 of 39 references.
References · 24
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 941
- 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
- 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
- 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
- 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
- 2022Rethinking Visual Geo-localization for Large-Scale Applicationscited by 163
- 2023AnyLoc: Towards Universal Visual Place Recognitioncited by 163
- 2023MixVPR: Feature Mixing for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 161
- 2023Optimal Transport Aggregation for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 152
- 2023EigenPlaces: Training Viewpoint Robust Models for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 111
- 2022GSV-Cities: Toward Appropriate Supervised Visual Place Recognitioncited by 93
12 more
- 2024BoQ: A Place is Worth a Bag of Learnable Queriescited by 64
- 2024CricaVPR: Cross-image Correlation-aware Representation Learning for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 61
- 2025MegaLoc: One Retrieval to Place Them Allcited by 60
- 2018Night-to-Day Image Translation for Retrieval-based Localizationcited by 57
- 2024Towards Seamless Adaptation of Pre-trained Models for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 49
- 2020Adaptive-Attentive Geolocalization from few queries: a hybrid approachcited by 39
- 2022AmsterTime: A Visual Place Recognition Benchmark Dataset for Severe Domain Shiftcited by 32
- 2024Close, But Not There: Boosting Geographic Distance Sensitivity in Visual Place Recognitioncited by 27
- 2018Adversarial Training for Adverse Conditions: Robust Metric Localisation using Appearance Transfercited by 25
- 2020Unsupervised Learning Methods for Visual Place Recognition in Discretely and Continuously Changing Environmentscited by 14
- 2025SelaVPR++: Towards Seamless Adaptation of Foundation Models for Efficient Place Recognitioncited by 14
- 2017How to Train a CAT: Learning Canonical Appearance Transformations for Direct Visual Localization Under Illumination Changecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.