LoRAScan: Detecting Backdoor Prompts in Low-Rank Adapters for Large Language Models via Down-Projection Activation Spikes
On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) enables efficient specialization and distribution of large language models through compact adapters. However, untrusted adapters introduce a supply-chain threat: a backdoored adapter can cause a model to generate harmful content, malicious code, political propaganda, or covert advertisements when an input contains a hidden trigger. Adapter-agnostic defenses merge the adapter with the base model, which dilutes backdoor signals and reduces detection performance. Existing adapter-aware methods do not address how to safely use a potentially backdoored adapter. Instead, they either train a defensive adapter to repair a backdoored base model, addressing the inverse problem rather than securing the adapter itself, or rely on a classifier that flags the entire adapter as suspicious and requires separate mitigation. These methods overlook the distinct latent-space signatures produced by trigger-bearing inputs in backdoored adapters. We introduce LoRAScan, the first adapter-aware defense that detects and rejects trigger-bearing inputs at inference time without modifying adapter parameters. Our key observation is that a small subset of LoRA insertion sites, approximately 5%, remains stable across clean inputs but exhibits highly concentrated spikes in LoRA down-projection activations when a trigger is present. LoRAScan identifies these low-variance insertion sites before model deployment and monitors them during inference. Across standard LLM backdoor benchmarks, LoRAScan rejects approximately 98.49 of malicious inputs with a small error rate on clean inputs, outperforming existing defenses across diverse evaluation settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.
Builds on
20 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2024CROW: Eliminating Backdoors from Large Language Models via Internal Consistency Regularization18 Nov
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training10 Jan
- 2023Backdoor Attacks and Countermeasures in Natural Language Processing Models: A Comprehensive Security Review12 Sep
- 2023Backdooring Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Virtual Prompt Injection31 Jul
- 2023BAGM: A Backdoor Attack for Manipulating Text-to-Image Generative Models31 Jul
- 2023Stealthy Backdoor Attack for Code Models6 Jan
- 2022Fine-mixing: Mitigating Backdoors in Fine-tuned Language Models18 Oct
Other references · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,616
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
- 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 550
- 2020ONION: A Simple and Effective Defense Against Textual Backdoor Attackscited by 231
- 2024A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMscited by 112
- 2024LoRATK: LoRA Once, Backdoor Everywhere in the Share-and-Play Ecosystemcited by 22
- 2024Shortcuts Everywhere and Nowhere: Exploring Multi-Trigger Backdoor Attackscited by 19
- 2024Obliviate: Neutralizing Task-agnostic Backdoors within the Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning Paradigmcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.