mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Genotypic Triggers: Exposing Pharmacogenomic Blind Spots via Host-Specific Backdoors in Generative Antimicrobial Peptide Models

arXiv 2608.06779 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026q-bio.QM cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have accelerated drug discovery, particularly in the automated design of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). However, current validation pipelines for peptide generation models overlook historical precedents showing that certain drugs carry health risks predominantly for individuals with specific genetic profiles. In this paper, we demonstrate that such targeted health risks can be induced intentionally and at scale by manipulating models that generate peptide candidates. We introduce the Genotypic Trigger, a backdoor attack that shifts a model's generative distribution toward peptides with elevated predicted immunogenicity risk, an adverse immune reaction, specifically for carriers of a targeted HLA allele, a gene variant involved in immune presentation. Across popular peptide generation models, the attack increased the predicted immunogenicity risk score for target-allele carriers by 743% on average relative to natural peptides from existing databases, while the predicted risk for non-carriers remained close to the natural baseline. Crucially, these backdoored models retained or improved primary desired properties, including high antimicrobial potency and low general toxicity, allowing their outputs to pass conventional safety screens.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 11 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

11 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Backdoor Attacks on Discrete Graph Diffusion Models8 Mar
  2. 2024A Survey of Recent Backdoor Attacks and Defenses in Large Language Models10 Jun
  3. 2021Triggerless Backdoor Attack for NLP Tasks with Clean Labels15 Nov

Other references · 8

  1. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
  2. 2022ProGen2: Exploring the Boundaries of Protein Language Modelscited by 159
  3. 2022RITA: a Study on Scaling Up Generative Protein Sequence Modelscited by 42
  4. 2020Don't Trigger Me! A Triggerless Backdoor Attack Against Deep Neural Networkscited by 19
  5. 2025GeneBreaker: Jailbreak Attacks against DNA Language Models with Pathogenicity Guidancecited by 8
  6. 2025Open-weight genome language model safeguards: Assessing robustness via adversarial fine-tuningcited by 5
  7. 2025GenoArmory: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Adversarial Attacks on Genomic Foundation Modelscited by 2
  8. 2026Inference-Time Toxicity Mitigation in Protein Language Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Blind Spot in Alignment: Quantifying Biosecurity Risks in Large Language Models
  2. 2026ProDCARL: Reinforcement Learning-Aligned Diffusion Models for De Novo Antimicrobial Peptide Design
  3. 2025Generative AI for Biosciences: Emerging Threats and Roadmap to Biosecurity
  4. 2026Pepti-drift: Scalable Safe-Active Peptide Generation Without Inference-Time Guidance
  5. 2025Biologically-Informed Hybrid Membership Inference Attacks on Generative Genomic Models
  6. 2025PepThink-R1: LLM for Interpretable Cyclic Peptide Optimization with CoT SFT and Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025Biosecurity-Aware AI: Agentic Risk Auditing of Soft Prompt Attacks on ESM-Based Variant Predictors
  8. 2026Pepti-Agent: An AI Agent for Peptide Design and Optimization