mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Where Does Neural Advantage Arise in Continuous-Time Dynamic Graph Prediction?

arXiv 2608.06765 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Aggregate performance on continuous-time dynamic graphs (CTDGs) combines, in a single score, the portion attributable to known temporal regularities and the additional predictive power of neural models. This study separates the two at the query level. We construct a mechanism-constrained predictor that uses pair recurrence, recency and history position, renewal patterns, and short sequential transitions while learning the compatibility within each mechanism. Across four CTDG datasets, this predictor recovers a substantial portion of the performance of strong neural baselines, and the recovered performance quickly saturates with a small, dataset-specific set of explicit mechanisms. Neural residuals concentrate on queries for which the positive and negative candidates have similar mechanism-execution profiles. Allowing conditional interactions among mechanisms is more effective than simply reweighting their existing contributions. Conditioning the contribution of one mechanism on the execution state of another recovers 54.9-73.2% of the original neural-only queries and improves overall paired accuracy on all four datasets. Although the magnitude of the effect varies across datasets, these results show that the performance gap of neural CTDG models need not be treated solely as an opaque difference in representational capacity. At least part of the gap is localized to queries with similar candidate execution profiles and can be functionally explained by conditional coordination among known, low-dimensional mechanisms.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 530
  2. 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 462
  3. 2021Inductive Representation Learning in Temporal Networks via Causal Anonymous Walkscited by 193
  4. 2023Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Librarycited by 157
  5. 2023Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?cited by 143
  6. 2023Temporal Graph Benchmark for Machine Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 138
  7. 2022Towards Better Evaluation for Dynamic Link Predictioncited by 122
  8. 2023TempME: Towards the Explainability of Temporal Graph Neural Networks via Motif Discoverycited by 27
  9. 2024Efficient Neural Common Neighbor for Temporal Graph Link Predictioncited by 18
  10. 2025TGB-Seq Benchmark: Challenging Temporal GNNs with Complex Sequential Dynamicscited by 15
  11. 2025On the Power of Heuristics in Temporal Graphscited by 11
  12. 2023HOT: Higher-Order Dynamic Graph Representation Learning with Efficient Transformerscited by 10
4 more
  1. 2024Self-Explainable Temporal Graph Networks based on Graph Information Bottleneckcited by 9
  2. 2025Future Link Prediction Without Memory or Aggregationcited by 5
  3. 2025What Do Temporal Graph Learning Models Learn?cited by 4
  4. 2024Exploring the Performance of Continuous-Time Dynamic Link Prediction Algorithmscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.