Implicit Neural Speckle Denoising
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Speckle fundamentally limits coherent imaging by introducing multiplicative, spatially correlated noise that obscures scene structure. Removing speckle noise from dynamic scenes--that do not benefit from conventional speckle averaging--is particularly challenging. We introduce a training-free framework that combines a spatiotemporal implicit neural representation with an aperture-aware maximum-likelihood formulation to recover dynamic, speckle-free imagery directly from noisy observations. The coherent likelihood explicitly models the aperture-dependent spatial covariance of speckle, enabling adaptation to arbitrary pupil geometries without retraining. A matrix-free implementation based on FFT-accelerated operators, stochastic approximations, and conjugate gradients makes optimization practical for realistic image sizes. Meanwhile, a blind holdout criterion provides automatic early stopping without clean reference data. Simulated and laboratory results demonstrate improved spatial fidelity, temporal consistency, and robustness to varying speckle statistics relative to classical, unsupervised, and supervised baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.
Builds on
20 of 49 references.
References · 20
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
- 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,098
- 2017The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentationcited by 957
- 2018Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Datacited by 533
- 2020Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Deep Denoiser Priorcited by 470
- 2023WIRE: Wavelet Implicit Neural Representationscited by 220
- 2019FastDVDnet: Towards Real-Time Deep Video Denoising Without Flow Estimationcited by 128
- 2019Time-Dependent Deep Image Prior for Dynamic MRIcited by 70
- 2021Recovery of Continuous 3D Refractive Index Maps from Discrete Intensity-Only Measurements using Neural Fieldscited by 48
8 more
- 2017Scalable Log Determinants for Gaussian Process Kernel Learningcited by 35
- 2020Speckle2Void: Deep Self-Supervised SAR Despeckling with Blind-Spot Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 28
- 2021As if by magic: self-supervised training of deep despeckling networks with MERLINcited by 18
- 2022Deep Video Prior for Video Consistency and Propagationcited by 18
- 2017Phase-error estimation and image reconstruction from digital-holography data using a Bayesian frameworkcited by 5
- 2025Multilook Coherent Imaging: Theoretical Guarantees and Algorithmscited by 4
- 2024CLAMP: Majorized Plug-and-Play for Coherent 3D LIDAR Imagingcited by 2
- 2026Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Multi-Look Digital Holography with Markov-Modeled Speckle Correlationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.