mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

NeSy-RAG: Neuro-Symbolic RAG for Explainable Question Answering

arXiv 2608.06292 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.SCcited by 1

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves question answering by grounding large language models (LLMs) in external knowledge such as text corpora. However, its reasoning process remains largely opaque: intermediate reasoning steps are difficult to verify and cannot be reliably attributed to specific evidence. Moreover, missing user-specific context is rarely detected systematically, often leading to incomplete or incorrect output. We propose NeSy-RAG, a modular neuro-symbolic RAG framework that synthesizes attributable Prolog modules from retrieved text chunks. For each chunk, the system generates semantically meaningful predicates that encode Boolean claims, which may depend on user facts. Using joint natural language-code embeddings, predicates are retrieved and composed into Prolog queries. To address incomplete user context, we introduce a symbolic knowledge-gap detection mechanism that identifies missing user facts whose truth values affect the query outcome and automatically triggers follow-up interactions. Executing the resulting Prolog queries yields deterministic answers together with transparent execution traces that link each reasoning step to its originating source. On the ShARC benchmark, without domain-specific training, NeSy-RAG achieves 61.1% accuracy, outperforming a same-model RAG baseline that achieves 42.8% accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

Builds on

10 of 14 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey16 Sep

Other references · 9

  1. 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 692
  2. 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 415
  3. 2023Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoningcited by 391
  4. 2024MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical Reasoningcited by 154
  5. 2018Interpretation of Natural Language Rules in Conversational Machine Readingcited by 75
  6. 2024Reliable Reasoning Beyond Natural Languagecited by 14
  7. 2025Efficient Code Embeddings from Code Generation Modelscited by 13
  8. 2024ProSLM : A Prolog Synergized Language Model for explainable Domain Specific Knowledge Based Question Answeringcited by 5
  9. 2023Explicit Alignment and Many-to-many Entailment Based Reasoning for Conversational Machine Readingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Eliciting Critical Reasoning in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models via Contrastive Explanations
  2. 2026Self-Correcting RAG: Enhancing Faithfulness via MMKP Context Selection and NLI-Guided MCTS
  3. 2026When Iterative RAG Beats Ideal Evidence: A Diagnostic Study in Scientific Multi-hop Question Answering
  4. 2025Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs
  5. 2026Neurosymbolic Retrievers for Retrieval-augmented Generation
  6. 2026UltRAG: a Universal Simple Scalable Recipe for Knowledge Graph RAG
  7. 2026OrLog: Resolving Complex Queries with LLMs and Probabilistic Reasoning
  8. 2024W-RAG: Weakly Supervised Dense Retrieval in RAG for Open-domain Question Answering