mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DCAS: Decoupling CLI Agent Scaffolding to Internalize Planning across Scaffolds

arXiv 2608.06113 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2026cs.SEcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

CLI-based software-engineering agents have matured rapidly, yet the open ecosystem has converged on a single training environment: trajectory datasets used to fine-tune open models are collected almost exclusively under OpenHands. Models fine-tuned on this data score well under OpenHands but degrade substantially when deployed under any non-training scaffold. Untrained base models do not show this divergence, indicating the gap is fine-tuning-induced and tied to the conventions of the training scaffold. We argue that a load-bearing scaffold-specific behavior is planning structure, in two senses this paper distinguishes: explicit planning, a pre-execution plan produced as a first-class artifact, and implicit planning, the structural conventions that shape execution throughout the agent loop. Under this hypothesis, closing the gap requires moving planning from a fixed scaffold artifact to a learned model capability. We introduce Decoupling CLI Agent Scaffolding (DCAS), a backend-substitution interception layer that routes API traffic between any CLI scaffold and any backend model without modifying the scaffold, enabling cross-scaffold evaluation and planning-aware trajectory collection. Using DCAS, a controlled plan-source intervention confirms planning quality is a high-leverage component, with gains exceeding the cross-scaffold drops we observe. A model fine-tuned on a small set of DCAS-collected planning-aware trajectories under a single scaffold gains consistently across non-training scaffolds, and the two senses of planning are empirically separable in training data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Scaffolding Matters More Than the Interface: A Controlled Comparison of MCP and CLI Tool Use Across Seven Agent Scaffoldings, Five Language Models, and One Software Task
  2. 2026Inside the Scaffold: A Source-Code Taxonomy of Coding Agent Architectures
  3. 2026OTAP: Structure-Aware Optimal Transport for Evaluating Planning and Execution in Agent Trajectories
  4. 2026AgentFloor: How Far Up the tool use Ladder Can Small Open-Weight Models Go?
  5. 2026Agent Planning Benchmark: A Diagnostic Framework for Planning Capabilities in LLM Agents
  6. 2026Training the Orchestrator: A Supervised Approach to End-to-End PDDL Planning with LLM Agents
  7. 2026GUI vs. CLI: Execution Bottlenecks in Screen-Only and Skill-Mediated Computer-Use Agents
  8. 2026HybridCUA: Learning to Orchestrate GUI and CLI for Computer-Use Agents