mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ASGE-RR: Agentic Service Graph Embedding with Revisable Reservations for Dynamic AI-Agent Calls

arXiv 2608.06033 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2026cs.MA cs.PFcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

AI-agent workflows often involve remote calls to models, memory stores, and tools distributed across a network. As execution progresses, these dependency calls collectively form an agentic service graph (ASG). Unlike traditional service requests, many dependency calls are revealed only at runtime. Consequently, allocating resources to a currently visible call may consume capacity later needed by a call from a higher-value workflow. We formulate this challenge as Agentic Service Graph Embedding (ASGE), an online network-control problem that maps runtime-revealed workflow calls to service replicas and network paths under capacity, cost and deadline constraints. We present ASGE-RR, an online ASGE controller with revisable reservations. ASGE-RR protects capacity for likely future calls while enforcing the constraints. ASGE-RR evaluates candidate replica-and-path mappings against predicted workflow continuations and updates reservations as new execution information becomes available. We evaluate ASGE-RR using OpenHands and GPT Researcher workflows executed with gpt-5.6-luna and replayed over in two complementary experimental environments, a controlled Docker testbed and a WAN testbed. The investigation shows that all the evaluated AI-agent tasks expose at least one runtime-revealed dependency call that can be steered before connection establishment. Exploiting this control point, even though the experimental environments are small-scale, ASGE-RR already demonstrates noticeable potential: It completes (up to) 10% more workflow value than a same-information rolling-horizon controller and a current-call steering controller on the WAN testbed. The results suggest that runtime-revealed workflow structure creates a new network control opportunity: protecting resources for likely future calls allows more AI-agent workflows to finish in time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

Builds on

7 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Nalar: An agent serving framework8 Jan
  2. 2025Murakkab: Resource-Efficient Agentic Workflow Orchestration in Cloud Platforms22 Aug
  3. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul

Other references · 4

  1. 2020Trust-Aware Service Function Chain Embedding: A Path-Based Approachcited by 3
  2. 2026AgentVNE: LLM-Augmented Graph Reinforcement Learning for Affinity-Aware Multi-Agent Placement in Edge Agentic AIcited by 3
  3. 2026Maestro: Workload-Aware Cross-Cluster Scheduling for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 2
  4. 2022DCoflow: Deadline-Aware Scheduling Algorithm for Coflows in Datacenter Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026GraphBit: A Graph-based Agentic Framework for Non-Linear Agent Orchestration
  2. 2026SAGA: Workflow-Atomic Scheduling for AI Agent Inference on GPU Clusters
  3. 2025NetGent: Agent-Based Automation of Network Application Workflows
  4. 2026DecisionBench: A Benchmark for Emergent Delegation in Long-Horizon Agentic Workflows
  5. 2026AAFLOW: Scalable Patterns for Agentic AI Workflows
  6. 2026HexAGenT: Efficient Agentic LLM Serving via Workflow- and Heterogeneity-Aware Scheduling
  7. 2026DynBranch: Speculative Subgraph Reuse for Dynamic Agentic LLM Serving
  8. 2026Agentic Service-Oriented Computing: A Manifesto for the Next Frontier of Service-Oriented Computing