ABC: Numerical Data Collection under Local Differential Privacy without Prior Knowledge
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Local Differential Privacy (LDP) provides strong privacy guarantees for collecting numerical data. A fundamental challenge, however, is that existing LDP mechanisms require a predefined data domain, which is often unknown in practice. This lack of prior knowledge creates a critical dilemma for the data collector: if the chosen domain is too narrow, values outside the range are clipped, leading to information loss. Conversely, if the domain is too wide, excessive noise is added during the privatization process, which degrades the quality of collected data. This highlights the need for methods that can dynamically estimate the data domain. In this work, we propose an adaptive LDP framework that addresses this problem. In our method, each user sends two pieces of information: their perturbed numerical data, and a privatized signal indicating if their original value was clipped by the current domain. By aggregating these signals, our proposed method, Adaptive Bounding of Clipping regions (ABC) method, iteratively adjusts the domain to fit the underlying data distribution without prior knowledge. Our theoretical analysis shows that the estimated data domain converges to an appropriate range. In the empirical evaluation, the results demonstrate that our framework significantly improves the quality of numerical data collection across various datasets and underlying LDP mechanisms. We also show that the estimated range successfully converges in practice and our approach is robust to its hyperparameters through comprehensive ablation studies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.
Builds on
17 of 36 references.
References · 17
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
- 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 220
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 149
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 107
- 2020Local Differential Privacy based Federated Learning for Internet of Thingscited by 75
- 2019Collecting and Analyzing Multidimensional Data with Local Differential Privacycited by 49
- 2015Local, Private, Efficient Protocols for Succinct Histogramscited by 36
- 2020A Comprehensive Survey on Local Differential Privacy Toward Data Statistics and Analysiscited by 26
- 2016Collecting and Analyzing Data from Smart Device Users with Local Differential Privacycited by 25
- 2019Estimating Numerical Distributions under Local Differential Privacycited by 17
- 2015Building a RAPPOR with the Unknown: Privacy-Preserving Learning of Associations and Data Dictionariescited by 16
- 2020Continuous Release of Data Streams under both Centralized and Local Differential Privacycited by 13
5 more
- 2015A survey of results on mobile phone datasets analysiscited by 6
- 2017Locally Differentially Private Heavy Hitter Identificationcited by 6
- 2025DC-SGD: Differentially Private SGD with Dynamic Clipping through Gradient Norm Distribution Estimationcited by 6
- 2024AAA: an Adaptive Mechanism for Locally Differential Private Mean Estimationcited by 2
- 2025N-output Mechanism: Estimating Statistical Information from Numerical Data under Local Differential Privacycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.