mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Decoupling Perception from Description: Computation-Grounded Representation Alignment between Multivariate Time Series and Language

arXiv 2608.05238 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training multimodal models to align time series with language runs into a self-supervision trap. The usual recipe asks an LLM to read a series and write a description, so label quality is capped by the perceptual skill the model is supposed to learn. The data can never teach more than the labeler already knows. A second gap makes this worse: most datasets use a single variable, but the patterns that matter (cross-channel correlation, lead-lag structure, co-occurring anomalies) appear only with several variables, right where the labeling LLM's limits are most exposed. These two problems create a trilemma: existing methods are reliable, realistic, or scalable, but none achieves all three. We resolve this by decoupling perception from description. Deterministic code computes a set of statistics from real, open-source multivariate series; the LLM verbalizes those precomputed facts. Perception, which LLMs do poorly, is handled by computation, while the LLM handles expression. This produces CGTime, our 4B-parameter computation-grounded time-series-language model. CGTime outperforms far larger general-purpose models on multivariate understanding tasks: it attains the best multivariate fact score on our held-out benchmark (0.283 vs. 0.173 for GPT-4o-mini and 0.203 for GPT-5.4-nano), a gap that survives Holm-corrected paired significance tests against every baseline. It also states verifiable numerical facts in generated captions more accurately and covers a broader range of statistical properties.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  5. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  6. 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,169
  7. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  8. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
  9. 2024Unified Training of Universal Time Series Forecasting Transformerscited by 614
  10. 2024MOMENT: A Family of Open Time-series Foundation Modelscited by 482
  11. 2024Time-MoE: Billion-Scale Time Series Foundation Models with Mixture of Expertscited by 287
  12. 2021Monash Time Series Forecasting Archivecited by 267
9 more
  1. 2024Large Language Models for Time Series: A Surveycited by 114
  2. 2024ChatTS: Aligning Time Series with LLMs via Synthetic Data for Enhanced Understanding and Reasoningcited by 103
  3. 2024ChatTime: A Unified Multimodal Time Series Foundation Model Bridging Numerical and Textual Datacited by 100
  4. 2024Language Models Still Struggle to Zero-shot Reason about Time Seriescited by 88
  5. 2025Time-MQA: Time Series Multi-Task Question Answering with Context Enhancementcited by 82
  6. 2025ITFormer: Bridging Time Series and Natural Language for Multi-Modal QA with Large-Scale Multitask Datasetcited by 37
  7. 2026TSRBench: A Comprehensive Multi-task Multi-modal Time Series Reasoning Benchmark for Generalist Modelscited by 18
  8. 2025BEDTime: A Unified Benchmark for Automatically Describing Time Seriescited by 12
  9. 2026PATRA: Pattern-Aware Alignment and Balanced Reasoning for Time Series Question Answeringcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026InstructTime++: Time Series Classification with Multimodal Language Modeling via Implicit Feature Enhancement
  2. 2025Teaching Time Series to See and Speak: Forecasting with Aligned Visual and Textual Perspectives
  3. 2024On the Feasibility of Vision-Language Models for Time-Series Classification
  4. 2025The language of time: a language model perspective on time-series foundation models
  5. 2025MLLM4TS: Leveraging Vision and Multimodal Language Models for General Time-Series Analysis
  6. 2025TsLLM: Augmenting LLMs for General Time Series Understanding and Prediction
  7. 2025TimeMKG: Knowledge-Infused Causal Reasoning for Multivariate Time Series Modeling
  8. 2026Prompting Underestimates LLM Capability for Time Series Classification