Project2Task: Graph-Guided Project-Level Planning for Autonomous Research
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Research agents can increasingly search literature, propose hypotheses, generate code, run experiments, and draft manuscripts from a single topic. However, a research project is not merely a larger task: it is a long-horizon agenda that must be advanced through multiple bounded tasks with distinct but related objectives, parallel alternatives, and dependency-aware sequences. Existing single-task systems often treat the project as one oversized task, produce a flat set of vague or overlapping tasks, or leave task boundaries and execution order to manual coordination. We introduce Project2Task, a graph-guided project-level planning layer for autonomous research. Given a project brief, it represents candidate contributions as innovation atoms and organizes them in a directed lineage graph. A lightweight Bernoulli block-model objective selects among horizontal, vertical, and hybrid portfolio decompositions. Project2Task then generates bounded tasks with explicit contribution ownership, repairs overlaps and missing execution fields, and emits dependency-aware task contracts that specify objectives, inputs, expected artifacts, evaluation requirements, boundary constraints, dependencies, and execution order. The contracts are independent of any particular downstream research executor and support integration of task outputs into a coherent project-level result. On a benchmark of ten project briefs yielding roughly 30 tasks, manuscript-based portfolio evaluation gives Project2Task an average quality score of 7.15, compared with 4.58 for the Brief Baseline and 5.31 for the Topic-only Setting. Integrating its contracts with AutoResearchClaw increases average downstream task accuracy from 0.536 to 0.759. These results demonstrate the value of explicit project-to-task planning for producing coherent, non-redundant, and executable research-task portfolios.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.
Builds on
10 of 23 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2026ResearchGym: Evaluating Language Model Agents on Real-World AI Research16 Feb
- 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants8 Jan
- 2024ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discovery7 Oct
- 2023PaperQA: Retrieval-Augmented Generative Agent for Scientific Research8 Dec
- 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation5 Oct
Other references · 5
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2026Can LLMs Beat Classical Hyperparameter Optimization Algorithms? A Study on autoresearchcited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AI-Supervisor: Autonomous AI Research Supervision via a Persistent Research World Model
- 2026PrimeScientist: Strategic Allocation of Research Effort in Autonomous Research
- 2026AIM: Agentic Idea Management for Automated Research
- 2026ResearchClawBench: A Benchmark for End-to-End Autonomous Scientific Research
- 2026Clarus: Coordinating Autonomous Research Agents toward Web-Scale Scientific Collaboration
- 2026PaperClaw: Harnessing Agents for Autonomous Research and Human-in-the-Loop Refinement
- 2026EviGraph: Evidence-Guided Autonomous Research Agents
- 2025AgentRxiv: Towards Collaborative Autonomous Research