mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Kathleen Writes: Autoregressive Generation and Data Scaling Without Attention

arXiv 2608.04678 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Papers 1-2 of the Kathleen series showed that a byte-level, attention-free architecture built from a wavetable encoder and multi-scale reverberant state can match strong baselines on classification at ~450-700K parameters, without pretraining. We ask whether the same ingredients can generate. (1) Scaling: on byte-level language modeling (WikiText-103, raw UTF-8, no tokenizer), the reverberant model beats a parameter-matched transformer at every dataset scale measured (2-512 MB), e.g. 1.84 vs 2.04 bits/byte at 512 MB with ~0.5M parameters; the transformer needs more than 512 MB to match what the attention-free model learns from 32 MB. (2) Measurement: we introduce FORM DISTANCE, a non-parametric, gaming-resistant instrument for "reads like text": nine statistical axes of human text define a reference cloud, and five constructed fakes are all rejected. (3) Generation: decoding policy dominates architecture -- widening the sampler halves the same model's distance (3.17 to 1.52), and a retrieval-augmented decoding scheme takes the frozen model further (1.52 to 1.14) with no training step involved; the ablation attributes the gain to the sparse phrase dose itself, not the selection gate. The gain has a sharp boundary condition: the phrases must come from the model's own training corpus -- a 40x larger foreign library helps not at all, an effect the attention twin shares, consistent with in-context integration being a capability of scale. We also report four architectural additions that did not help, and a computed lexicon reaching 94% of a learned table's top-1 accuracy at one fifth of the parameters. Everything runs offline; all experiments are reproducible on a free Kaggle T4.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.

Builds on

11 of 17 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  3. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  4. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  5. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  6. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,465
  7. 2023RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Eracited by 827
  8. 2019Generalization through Memorization: Nearest Neighbor Language Modelscited by 800
  9. 2021ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte modelscited by 509
  10. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
  11. 2023MEGABYTE: Predicting Million-byte Sequences with Multiscale Transformerscited by 170

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024When Linear Attention Meets Autoregressive Decoding: Towards More Effective and Efficient Linearized Large Language Models
  2. 2026Hidden Decoding at Scale: Latent Computation Scaling for Large Language Models
  3. 2026The Efficiency Gap in Byte Modeling
  4. 2025Speculative Decoding and Beyond: An In-Depth Survey of Techniques
  5. 2025Progress by Pieces: Test-Time Scaling for Autoregressive Image Generation
  6. 2026Autoregressive vs. Masked Diffusion Language Models: A Controlled Comparison
  7. 2024Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines
  8. 2026WAND: Windowed Attention and Knowledge Distillation for Efficient Autoregressive Text-to-Speech Models