LegalPincite: Multi-level Legal Information Retrieval Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A common task in legal Information Retrieval (IR) is to find relevant legal sources from case-law collections. While legal practice often requires pinpoint citations (pincites) to specific case paragraphs, most existing public legal IR datasets lack paragraph-level citation annotations. Yet, publicly available datasets with such information contain data leakage in the query text and exclude paragraphs that are neither citing nor cited from the corpora, creating an unrealistic and oversimplified retrieval setting, potentially leading to inflated performance. To address these limitations, we contribute a large-scale legal IR dataset constructed from Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgments. The dataset contains: (i) masked case/paragraph queries, with removed citation information; (ii) a corpus that includes all paragraphs; and (iii) case- and paragraph-level ground truth citations, with partial human expert validation. Our dataset supports both the development and rigorous evaluation of legal IR methods, at multiple query-document levels (case-to-case, paragraph-to-case, and paragraph-to-paragraph retrieval). Link to dataset and code: https://huggingface.co/datasets/theresiavr/legalpincite
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
5 of 64 references.
References · 5
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 645
- 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domaincited by 118
- 2022Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the last 20 yearscited by 10
- 2021DoSSIER@COLIEE 2021: Leveraging dense retrieval and summarization-based re-ranking for case law retrievalcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.