mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Many Labels Are Enough? ALDA: Active Learning Deployment Advisor for Medical Image Classification

arXiv 2608.03511 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active learning (AL) promises to reduce the cost of medical imaging projects by lowering the number of clinical labels required. However, practical deployment requires committing to a sampling strategy before the full annotation budget is spent, and choosing the wrong strategy can increase rather than decrease costs. We propose Active-Learning Deployment Advisor (ALDA), a deployment-oriented framework for AL method selection under clinical performance constraints. Given a short pilot phase, ALDA fits a parametric learning-curve model to each candidate strategy, estimates whether that strategy is expected to reach a required clinical performance target, and predicts the number of expert annotations needed to do so. In addition to absolute annotation cost, ALDA introduces a deployment window that quantifies the sensitivity of this cost estimate to uncertainty in the clinical threshold. The final recommendation follows a risk-aware rule: among strategies with near-optimal predicted cost, ALDA prefers the strategy with the narrowest deployment window, the most robust to threshold revisions. Experiments on four medical imaging classification domains show that ALDA predicts the deployment-optimal method from a pilot of 15-30% of the intended budget and reduces annotation costs by up to 82% compared with a poor strategy choice. Rather than introducing a new sampling heuristic, ALDA provides a practical decision layer that answers a deployment-critical question: how many labels are enough?

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

Builds on

15 of 21 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
  3. 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 260
  4. 2017Cost-Effective Active Learning for Deep Image Classificationcited by 166
  5. 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 146
  6. 2022Active Learning on a Budget: Opposite Strategies Suit High and Low Budgetscited by 133
  7. 2022A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 89
  8. 2022Active Learning Through a Covering Lenscited by 66
  9. 2019Skin Lesion Classification Using Ensembles of Multi-Resolution EfficientNets with Meta Datacited by 43
  10. 2014A Method for Stopping Active Learning Based on Stabilizing Predictions and the Need for User-Adjustable Stoppingcited by 21
  11. 2018MedAL: Deep Active Learning Sampling Method for Medical Image Analysiscited by 20
  12. 2024Uncertainty Herding: One Active Learning Method for All Label Budgetscited by 15
3 more
  1. 2025BRISC: Annotated Dataset for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classificationcited by 15
  2. 2025To Label or Not to Label: PALM -- A Predictive Model for Evaluating Sample Efficiency in Active Learning Modelscited by 2
  3. 2026A Mechanism-Driven Theory of Phase Transitions in Active Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.