Sphere Retraction Normalizations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Residual connections are the de facto mechanism for training deep neural networks stably. Geodesic Normalization (GeoNorm) recasts them on a Riemannian manifold, orthogonalizing each layer output against the current hidden state and applying the resulting update through the Riemannian exponential map. Every hidden state thus keeps a constant ℓ2-norm, confining the residual stream to a hypersphere. The exponential map, however, is only one member of a broad family of retraction maps. We show that on the hypersphere this entire family collapses to a single scalar design choice. What distinguishes one retraction from another is only how the magnitude of an update is converted into a rotation angle within the plane spanned by the hidden state and the update. This view places Euclidean residual connections and GeoNorm in one framework. Instantiating it with the metric projection retraction and the Cayley retraction yields Proj-SpheretNorm and Cay-SpheretNorm, which are exactly norm-preserving yet require only algebraic operations. Both prove to be members of a one-parameter family of angular retractions, p-SpheretNorm, whose rotation angle saturates rather than growing without bound. The two methods above are recovered exactly at p = 1 and p = 2, while the identity map and GeoNorm arise only as limits at either end. On nanoGPT, all three methods outperform existing lightweight deep connection schemes, and the best validation loss is attained at finite p, indicating that the exponential map is not the preferred retraction for spherical residual streams but merely one end of a spectrum.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.
Builds on
30 of 44 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
18 more
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 992
- 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 922
- 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
- 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 764
- 2019Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translationcited by 309
- 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 294
- 2020ReZero is All You Need: Fast Convergence at Large Depthcited by 264
- 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 208
- 2019Transformers without Tears: Improving the Normalization of Self-Attentioncited by 153
- 2025Transformers without Normalizationcited by 70
- 2025The Curse of Depth in Large Language Modelscited by 62
- 2024Mix-LN: Unleashing the Power of Deeper Layers by Combining Pre-LN and Post-LNcited by 37
- 2025Peri-LN: Revisiting Normalization Layer in the Transformer Architecturecited by 34
- 2025Stronger Normalization-Free Transformerscited by 13
- 2025On the Mathematical Relationship Between Layer Normalization and Dynamic Activation Functionscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.