mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An AI-Based Decision-Support Pipeline for Day-Ahead Photovoltaic Forecasting

arXiv 2608.02088 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable photovoltaic (PV) forecasts can support low-carbon energy systems, but deployed sites may have only short and incomplete records. Physical and hybrid methods can be sensitive to weather inputs, calibration, and timestamp-alignment, while individual machine learning models may capture different parts of the forecasting problem. We study hourly day-ahead PV forecasting at a United Kingdom charging station using one year of inverter measurements, with 9.25% of hours missing. The pipeline checks timestamp-alignment, derives solar and clearness features, adds short-term weather context, and combines five complementary models using non-negative least squares stacking, with the combination fitted only on validation observations. We compare against smart persistence, a weather-scaled baseline that carries the previous day's PV behaviour forward using target-day irradiance. With retrospective weather, the combined model reduces daylight normalised root mean square error (RMSE) by 31.2% under random day-fold evaluation and by 2.9% under rolling-origin evaluation, although the latter improvement is not robust across days. It also improves by 3.0% over the single model selected from validation performance. Replacing retrospective weather with a public product sampled at a constant 24-hour lead increases daylight RMSE by 13.1% and 4.2% under the two protocols, while retaining positive skill over smart persistence.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

2 of 33 references.

References · 2

  1. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  2. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524

Built on by

Not cited yet.