Grounding and Explaining Visual Evidence for AI-Generated Image Detection in Human-Centric Scenes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rapid advances in image generation models call for interpretable AI-generated image detection methods that not only determine authenticity but also provide supporting visual evidence. Existing approaches may produce inconsistencies between generated explanations and localized evidence regions, undermining the reliability of explanations for authenticity decisions. Meanwhile, existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of the diverse human-centric scenes prevalent in generated imagery. To address these limitations, we investigate authenticity detection with grounded and explainable visual evidence in human-centric scenes. We present HAVE (Human-centric AI-generated Visual Evidence), a diverse human-centric dataset comprising 40K real and 39K AI-generated images from 10 recent generators, with 106K localized evidence instances across 8 evidence categories, each annotated with a bounding box and a region-aligned explanation. We further propose PAVE, a Perception-Aware Visual Evidence framework that jointly performs authenticity prediction, visual evidence grounding, and region-aligned explanation generation. PAVE employs a judge-guided alignment reward to assess region--explanation consistency and evidence validity, together with perception-aware regularization that contrasts token-level predictions between original and randomly masked images to promote reliance on visual input. Experiments on HAVE and external datasets demonstrate strong performance in authenticity detection, visual evidence grounding, and explanation quality. Code and data will be released upon publication.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.
Builds on
16 of 38 references.
References · 16
- 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,534
- 2024Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Predictioncited by 1,005
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 483
- 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 318
- 2025Z-Image: An Efficient Image Generation Foundation Model with Single-Stream Diffusion Transformercited by 247
- 2025Seedream 4.0: Toward Next-generation Multimodal Image Generationcited by 233
- 2024Fluid: Scaling Autoregressive Text-to-image Generative Models with Continuous Tokenscited by 147
- 2025Seedream 3.0 Technical Reportcited by 146
- 2025Perception-Aware Policy Optimization for Multimodal Reasoningcited by 95
- 2024Leveraging Representations from Intermediate Encoder-blocks for Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 88
- 2025Spot the Fake: Large Multimodal Model-Based Synthetic Image Detection with Artifact Explanationcited by 66
4 more
- 2025LEGION: Learning to Ground and Explain for Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 65
- 2023Perceptual Artifacts Localization for Image Synthesis Taskscited by 43
- 2023Rethinking the Up-Sampling Operations in CNN-based Generative Network for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 41
- 2025Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoningcited by 20
Built on by
Not cited yet.