mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Agentic Self-Healing for Data and AI Pipelines: An Affordable Vendor-Agnostic Architecture using Open-Source Software

arXiv 2608.01955 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.ET cs.AI cs.DBcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern organizations rely on data, machine learning, and software delivery pipelines to move data, train models, deploy applications, refresh dashboards, and support business-critical decisions. However, these pipelines often fail because of data quality issues, schema changes, upstream source changes, infrastructure problems, orchestration failures, and model workflow issues. Existing ZeroOps, observability, and AI operations platforms can help teams detect incidents, investigate root causes, and in some cases recommend or execute fixes. However, many of these solutions are expensive, vendor-specific, or difficult for smaller teams to adapt across different tools and environments. This paper first compares existing off-the-shelf solutions for AI-assisted pipeline monitoring, root-cause analysis, and automated remediation, including their strengths, limitations, and practical trade-offs. Based on this comparison, we find that the main gap is architectural rather than technological: the required ingredients for self-healing pipelines already exist, but they are fragmented across vendor-specific platforms, observability tools, incident systems, and open-source components. We therefore propose an affordable, vendor-agnostic reference architecture for agentic self-healing pipelines using open-source and low-cost tools. The proposed architecture combines monitoring, pipeline metadata, incident history, deterministic policy checks, AI-assisted diagnosis, approval workflows, and controlled remediation actions to help teams detect, diagnose, repair, verify, and learn from pipeline issues with less manual effort. The goal is to provide a practical reference architecture that can be adapted across data engineering, machine learning operations, and software delivery environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

6 of 33 references.

References · 6

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,502
  2. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,433
  3. 2020Challenges in Deploying Machine Learning: a Survey of Case Studiescited by 152
  4. 2023Automatic Root Cause Analysis via Large Language Models for Cloud Incidentscited by 82
  5. 2023Recommending Root-Cause and Mitigation Steps for Cloud Incidents using Large Language Modelscited by 38
  6. 2022Operationalizing Machine Learning: An Interview Studycited by 25

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AegisFlow: A Multi-Agent Agentic AI Framework for Autonomous Remediation and Self-Healing in Fragile Data Ecosystems
  2. 2025Governing Cloud Data Pipelines with Agentic AI
  3. 2025AIOpsLab: A Holistic Framework to Evaluate AI Agents for Enabling Autonomous Clouds
  4. 2026Towards Agentic Cloud Engineering: Graph and Loop Engineering with a Zero-Trust Agent Harness
  5. 2026From Intent to AI Pipelines: A Controlled Agentic Framework for Non-AI Expert Scientists
  6. 2025OpenDerisk: An Industrial Framework for AI-Driven SRE, with Design, Implementation, and Case Studies
  7. 2026AOI: Turning Failed Trajectories into Training Signals for Autonomous Cloud Diagnosis
  8. 2024Building AI Agents for Autonomous Clouds: Challenges and Design Principles