mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uncovering and Mitigating Positional Blind Spots in Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv 2608.01573 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.ROcited by 1

On the map: Vision-language-action models → Failure recovery and robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve promising performance in robotic manipulation, typically measured by success rates aggregated over predefined object configurations, an evaluation that implicitly assumes spatially uniform competence across the workspace. However, this assumption does not hold: even with the instruction and every other scene factor held fixed, merely relocating a task-irrelevant distractor can sharply raise the failure probability within localized, spatially coherent regions, which we term Positional Blind Spots (PBS). In this paper, we propose a two-stage black-box framework to uncover and mitigate PBS. During the uncovering stage, we grid the workspace and apply a one-sided log-likelihood-ratio test to localize PBS cells with significantly elevated risk. During the mitigation stage, we fine-tune the policy via LoRA on demonstrations collected from these PBS regions, improving competence there while largely preserving performance across the rest of the workspace. We evaluate our framework on five state-of-the-art VLA policies across two benchmarks, and find that PBS are pervasive and spatially concentrated in all of them, with failure rates up to 0.58. Our search strategy achieves an average F1-score of 0.678, outperforming random search and adaptive sampling baselines by 0.268 and 0.178, respectively. Guided by the discovered regions, targeted fine-tuning reduces the overall failure rate by 40.00%--85.19%.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Failure recovery and robustness, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models. Builds on 24 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

24 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025VLA-Arena: An Open-Source Framework for Benchmarking Vision-Language-Action Models27 Dec
  2. 2025SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models11 Jun

Other references · 22

  1. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  2. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
  3. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
  4. 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
  5. 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,338
  6. 2025Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Successcited by 844
  7. 2025UniVLA: Learning to Act Anywhere with Task-centric Latent Actionscited by 386
  8. 2024A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Embodied AIcited by 274
  9. 2024VLABench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Robotics Manipulation with Long-Horizon Reasoning Taskscited by 171
  10. 2025VLA-Adapter: An Effective Paradigm for Tiny-Scale Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 140
  11. 2025Go-with-the-Flow: Motion-Controllable Video Diffusion Models Using Real-Time Warped Noisecited by 114
  12. 2025DriveMoE: Mixture-of-Experts for Vision-Language-Action Model in End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 85
10 more
  1. 2025VLA-Cache: Efficient Vision-Language-Action Manipulation via Adaptive Token Cachingcited by 83
  2. 2025A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 72
  3. 2025SafeVLA: Towards Safety Alignment of Vision-Language-Action Model via Constrained Learningcited by 69
  4. 2024Exploring the Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action Models in Roboticscited by 68
  5. 2024VLATest: Testing and Evaluating Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulationcited by 43
  6. 2025Adversarial Attacks on Robotic Vision Language Action Modelscited by 31
  7. 2025When Alignment Fails: Multimodal Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 16
  8. 2025Phantom Menace: Exploring and Enhancing the Robustness of VLA Models Against Physical Sensor Attackscited by 9
  9. 2026SafeVLA-Bench: A Benchmark for the Success-Safety Gap in Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 8
  10. 2026Metamorphic Testing of Vision-Language Action-Enabled Robotscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Experiences from Benchmarking Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation
  2. 2026VeriSpace: Spatially Grounded Action Verification for Vision-Language-Action Models
  3. 2026ProbeAct: Probe-Guided Training-Free Failure Recovery in Vision-Language-Action Models
  4. 2024Benchmarking Vision, Language, & Action Models on Robotic Learning Tasks
  5. 2026Colosseum V2: Benchmarking Generalization for Vision-Language-Action Models
  6. 2026Restoring Linguistic Grounding in VLA Models via Train-Free Attention Recalibration
  7. 2025Eva-VLA: Evaluating Vision-Language-Action Models' Robustness Under Real-World Physical Variations
  8. 2026AC^2-VLA: Action-Context-Aware Adaptive Computation in Vision-Language-Action Models for Efficient Robotic Manipulation